The Android tablet market is heating up, with options ranging from budget-friendly to premium. We're pitting the Blackview Tab 11, a value-focused offering, against the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4, a more powerful and feature-rich device. This comparison will dissect their core components to determine which tablet best suits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset and 67W fast charging deliver a significantly smoother experience and reduced downtime. However, the Blackview Tab 11 remains a viable option for those on a tight budget who prioritize basic functionality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 | N/A |
| EDGE | - | No |
| GPRS | - | No |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 15 | 2022, August 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November | Available. Released 2022, August 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 247 x 156.7 x 8.1 mm (9.72 x 6.17 x 0.32 in) | 285 x 185.2 x 6.7 mm (11.22 x 7.29 x 0.26 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | No |
| Weight | 460 g (1.01 lb) | 620 g (1.37 lb) |
| | - | Stylus support (magnetic) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Asahi Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~225 ppi density) | 1600 x 2560 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~243 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.36 inches, 305.5 cm2 (~78.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.4 inches, 445.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 500 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T618 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G52 MP2 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, MIUI Pad 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
other unspecified camera | 50 MP, f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | - |
| Video | 720p | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 720p | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | No |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 video output |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 60% in 36 min, 100% in 68 min |
| Type | 6580 mAh | Li-Po 10000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gray, Green, Silver | Black, Silver, Green |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 400 EUR |
Blackview Tab 11
- More affordable price point
- Lightweight and portable
- Suitable for basic tasks
- Significantly slower processor
- Slow 10W charging
- Likely lower display quality
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 processor
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- Superior display quality (likely)
- Higher price tag
- Potentially heavier build
- May be overkill for basic users
Display Comparison
While both tablets offer large displays, details beyond size are missing for the Blackview Tab 11. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4’s 12.4-inch display benefits from the Snapdragon 870’s powerful GPU for smooth visuals. The absence of display specs for the Blackview Tab 11 suggests a more basic panel, likely with lower brightness and color accuracy. The Xiaomi’s larger screen real estate, combined with its processing power, makes it superior for media consumption and productivity.
Camera Comparison
Given the context data, a detailed camera comparison is limited. Both tablets likely feature basic camera setups geared towards video calls and casual snapshots. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4, given its higher positioning, likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms. Without specific sensor details for the Blackview Tab 11, it’s safe to assume the Xiaomi offers a more refined camera experience.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a flagship-level chipset, featuring a Kryo 585 CPU clocked up to 3.2 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Blackview Tab 11’s Unisoc Tiger T618 (12nm). The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 870 offers significantly improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained peak performance. The Snapdragon 870’s CPU architecture – a mix of Cortex-A78 and A55 cores – is also more advanced than the Tab 11’s Cortex-A75 and A55 configuration, resulting in faster application loading and smoother multitasking. The Xiaomi’s superior GPU will also handle graphically intensive tasks with ease.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer. It can reach 60% charge in just 36 minutes and 100% in 68 minutes, minimizing downtime. The Blackview Tab 11’s 10W charging is comparatively slow, requiring significantly longer to fully recharge. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging of the Xiaomi effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The Xiaomi also supports PD3.0 and QC4 standards, offering broader compatibility with chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview Tab 11 if you need a basic tablet for light tasks like web browsing, video streaming, and note-taking, and your budget is a primary concern. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 if you demand a responsive experience for multitasking, gaming, and creative work, and you value fast charging and long-term performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Unisoc Tiger T618 in the Blackview Tab 11 sufficient for playing demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Unisoc Tiger T618 is a budget-oriented chipset. While it can handle less demanding games, Genshin Impact and similar titles will likely require significant graphics settings reductions and may still experience noticeable lag or frame drops. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4’s Snapdragon 870 is far better suited for demanding gaming.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 compared to the 10W charging on the Blackview Tab 11 in real-world use?
The difference is dramatic. The Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 can go from 0% to 60% in under 40 minutes, while the Blackview Tab 11 will take several hours to reach a full charge. This means less time tethered to a wall and more time using your tablet.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 support stylus input or keyboard attachments for increased productivity?
Yes, the Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 12.4 supports both stylus input (sold separately) and keyboard attachments, transforming it into a capable productivity device. The Blackview Tab 11’s support for these accessories is less certain and likely limited.
