The smartphone market is overflowing with options, making it tough to choose. Today, we're pitting the budget-friendly Blackview Oscal S80 against the popular Samsung Galaxy A54. Can the Oscal S80 challenge the established champion, or is the A54's reputation well-deserved?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner overall, boasting a superior chipset, brighter display, and more refined software experience. However, the Blackview Oscal S80 offers impressive value for its price, particularly if you prioritize reverse charging and a large display on a tight budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 03 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 13 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 174 x 81.4 x 18.9 mm (6.85 x 3.20 x 0.74 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 460 g (1.01 lb) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m
MIL-STD-810H compliant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769 Helio G85 (12nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.0 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.55", PDAF
8 MP, 117˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, (depth) | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Unspecified | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 51% in 66 min (advertised)
Reverse charging | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 13000 mAh, non-removable | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Navy Green, Mecha Orange, Conquest Black | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | - | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 170 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Blackview Oscal S80
- Large Display
- Reverse Charging
- Competitive Price
- Decent Performance for the Price
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Lower Display Quality
- Less Refined Software
- Camera Not as Good
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent Performance
- Vibrant Display
- Superior Camera
- Refined Software
- Long Battery Life
- Slower Charging (25W)
- Higher Price
- No Reverse Charging
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54's 980 nits peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio provide a significantly better viewing experience than the Oscal S80. While the Oscal S80's display is adequate, it lacks the vibrancy and clarity of the A54's Super AMOLED panel. Color accuracy and outdoor visibility are noticeably better on the A54.
Camera Comparison
Samsung's camera prowess shines through with the Galaxy A54. While the Oscal S80 has a multi-lens setup, the A54 delivers superior image quality, dynamic range, and video stabilization. The A54's image processing is also more refined, resulting in more natural-looking photos. Low-light performance is notably better on the A54.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 is a substantial upgrade over the Helio G85 in the Oscal S80. The A54's 5nm process offers better efficiency and significantly faster processing speeds. Expect smoother multitasking, quicker app loading times, and better gaming performance on the A54. The Oscal S80 is adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with demanding games.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with the Galaxy A54 demonstrating impressive endurance ratings. While the Oscal S80's 33W charging is competitive, the A54's 25W charging is still sufficient. The A54's power efficiency, thanks to its more modern chipset, contributes to its exceptional battery performance.
Buying Guide
The Blackview Oscal S80 is ideal for budget-conscious users who want a large screen and reverse charging capabilities. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is perfect for those seeking a reliable, well-rounded phone with excellent performance, a vibrant display, and a strong camera system, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Blackview Oscal S80 worth buying?
If you're on a very tight budget and prioritize a large screen and reverse charging, the Oscal S80 can be a decent option. However, be prepared for compromises in performance and camera quality.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
The Samsung Galaxy A54 will receive longer software updates and security patches compared to the Blackview Oscal S80, thanks to Samsung's commitment to Android updates.
