The tablet market is booming, and budget options are increasingly appealing. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Blackview Oscal Pad 13 and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad. Both promise great value, but which one delivers the best experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad takes the crown thanks to its superior chipset, brighter display, and generally more polished software experience. While the Oscal Pad 13 offers a competitive price, the Redmi Pad's performance and features justify the slight premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 | N/A |
| EDGE | - | N/A |
| GPRS | - | N/A |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 12 | 2022, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 17 | Available. Released 2022, October 05 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 239.2 x 158 x 7.6 mm (9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 in) | 250.5 x 158.1 x 7.1 mm (9.86 x 6.22 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | No |
| Weight | 435 g (15.34 oz) | 465 g (1.03 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~220 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~78.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.61 inches, 320.4 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 13 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, 1/4", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.3, 105° (ultrawide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | No |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 7680 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 8000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glacier Blue, Space Grey | Graphite Gray, Moonlight Silver, Mint Green |
| Models | - | 22081283G |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.36 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1529:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-23.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 319077 (v9)
GeekBench: 1852 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Blackview Oscal Pad 13
- Very affordable
- Decent display for the price
- Large screen size
- Less powerful chipset
- Potentially lower display brightness
- Less established brand
- Charging speed unknown
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
- More powerful chipset (Helio G99)
- Brighter display
- Better software experience
- Established brand reputation
- Faster charging (18W)
- Slightly more expensive
- Camera quality is still basic
Display Comparison
The Redmi Pad boasts a slightly brighter display (402 nits vs. likely lower on the Oscal Pad 13, though specific data is scarce) and a generally more refined visual experience. Both offer a 1529:1 contrast ratio, suggesting good black levels, but the Redmi Pad's higher brightness gives it an edge in various lighting conditions. The Redmi Pad's display also benefits from Xiaomi's display calibration, resulting in more accurate colors.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality is often an afterthought in budget tablets. While neither device excels in this area, the Redmi Pad likely offers slightly better image processing and overall quality due to its more advanced chipset. Expect decent, but not exceptional, results from both.
Performance
Here, the Redmi Pad pulls ahead significantly. The Mediatek Helio G99, built on a 6nm process, is considerably more powerful than the Unisoc T606 (12nm) found in the Oscal Pad 13. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Redmi Pad. The Cortex-A76 cores in the Redmi Pad's CPU are also a significant upgrade over the Oscal Pad 13's Cortex-A75 cores.
Battery Life
Battery life is likely comparable between the two, with both devices offering all-day usage for moderate tasks. The Redmi Pad's 18W wired charging provides a slightly faster charging speed than the Oscal Pad 13, though specific charging speeds for the Oscal Pad 13 are not readily available.
Buying Guide
The Blackview Oscal Pad 13 is ideal for users on a tight budget who prioritize affordability and basic tablet functionality. The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is a better choice for those seeking a smoother, more responsive experience, a brighter screen for media consumption, and a more established brand reputation.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Oscal Pad 13 good for gaming?
The Oscal Pad 13 can handle basic games, but don't expect high frame rates or smooth performance in demanding titles. The Redmi Pad is a much better choice for gaming.
❓ Which tablet has better build quality?
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad generally has better build quality and a more premium feel due to Xiaomi's established design and manufacturing expertise.
