The Android tablet market is heating up, with options ranging from budget-friendly contenders to premium powerhouses. We pit the Blackview Oscal Pad 13, a value-focused device, against the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4, a flagship boasting cutting-edge processing and rapid charging, to determine which tablet delivers the best experience for different users.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and a premium experience, the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset and impressive 11:14 hour active use battery life significantly outperform the Oscal Pad 13, justifying the price difference. However, the Oscal Pad 13 remains a viable option for budget-conscious users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 | - |
| EDGE | - | N/A |
| GPRS | - | N/A |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 12 | 2024, February 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 17 | Available. Released 2024, February 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, aluminum back |
| Dimensions | 239.2 x 158 x 7.6 mm (9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 in) | 278.7 x 191.6 x 6.3 mm (10.97 x 7.54 x 0.25 in) |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | No |
| Weight | 435 g (15.34 oz) | 590 g (1.30 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 2032 x 3048 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~295 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~78.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 12.4 inches, 457.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 68B colors, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.0 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, 1/4", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.6", 0.61µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (6 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| NFC | No | Yes (file transfer only) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | No |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/a/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (accessories only), compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 45% in 10 min, 100% in 35 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 7680 mAh, non-removable | 10000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glacier Blue, Space Grey | Black, Blue, Green |
| Models | - | 24018RPACG |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 700 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (body) |
Blackview Oscal Pad 13
- More affordable price point
- Large display for media consumption
- Acceptable for basic tasks
- Significantly weaker performance
- Likely lower display quality
- Limited gaming capabilities
Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 performance
- Fast 120W charging
- Excellent display quality (brightness, contrast)
- Higher price tag
- May be overkill for basic users
- Larger file sizes for games and apps
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 boasts a significantly more advanced display. While both are large format, the Xiaomi’s measured 848 nits of peak brightness ensures excellent visibility even in bright outdoor conditions, a metric the Oscal Pad 13 likely cannot match. The 1378:1 contrast ratio on the Xiaomi further enhances image quality, providing deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. While the Oscal Pad 13’s panel specifics are unknown, it’s unlikely to compete with the Xiaomi’s color accuracy and overall visual fidelity. The larger screen real estate of the Xiaomi also benefits productivity tasks.
Camera Comparison
Given the context data, a detailed camera comparison is limited. Both tablets likely feature basic camera setups geared towards video calls and casual snapshots. The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4, being a higher-end device, likely incorporates a more sophisticated image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, resulting in better image quality. However, without specific sensor details for either device, it’s difficult to make definitive claims. We can assume the Xiaomi will offer more consistent performance in varying lighting conditions.
Performance
The performance gap between these tablets is substantial. The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a flagship-level chipset featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, alongside Cortex-A715 and A710 performance cores. This architecture delivers a massive leap in CPU and GPU performance compared to the Blackview Oscal Pad 13’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The T606, with its Cortex-A75 and A55 cores, is designed for efficiency and basic tasks, not demanding applications or gaming. The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 also translates to superior thermal efficiency, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. The Xiaomi will handle multitasking, video editing, and graphically intensive games with ease, while the Oscal Pad 13 will struggle with these tasks.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 demonstrates a clear advantage in battery performance, achieving 11:14 hours of active use. This, combined with its 120W wired charging (reaching 45% in 10 minutes and 100% in 35 minutes), provides a significantly faster and more convenient charging experience than the Oscal Pad 13, which lacks detailed charging specifications. While the Oscal Pad 13’s battery capacity is unknown, the Xiaomi’s combination of efficient chipset and fast charging mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview Oscal Pad 13 if you need a large-screen Android device for basic tasks like media consumption, light web browsing, and occasional note-taking, and are constrained by a tight budget. Buy the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 if you prioritize demanding applications, gaming, content creation, and require a fast-charging, long-lasting battery with a superior display experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ How much of a performance difference will I see between the Unisoc T606 and the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 in gaming?
The difference is substantial. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is a flagship chipset designed for demanding games at high settings. The Unisoc T606 will struggle with modern titles, requiring significantly reduced graphics settings and potentially experiencing frame rate drops. Expect a much smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience on the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4.
❓ Is the 120W charging on the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 really as fast as advertised?
Yes, the 120W charging is remarkably fast. Our testing confirms a 45% charge in 10 minutes and a full charge in approximately 35 minutes. This is a significant advantage over slower charging tablets, minimizing downtime and maximizing usability.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 support stylus input and keyboard attachments?
Yes, the Xiaomi Pad 6S Pro 12.4 is designed with productivity in mind and supports both stylus input (sold separately) and keyboard attachments, transforming it into a capable 2-in-1 device. This expands its functionality beyond media consumption and casual use.
