Looking for an affordable Android tablet? Blackview offers several compelling options, and the Oscal Pad 13 and Tab 12 are two popular contenders. But which one is right for you? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs and features to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oscal Pad 13 takes the win thanks to its significantly more powerful Unisoc T606 chipset. While the Tab 12 is a budget-friendly option, the Pad 13's improved performance makes it the better choice for smoother multitasking and gaming, despite similar pricing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 12 | 2022, May 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 17 | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 239.2 x 158 x 7.6 mm (9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 in) | 238.5 x 157.5 x 7.4 mm (9.39 x 6.20 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 435 g (15.34 oz) | 430 g (15.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~78.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~78.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.0 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, 1/4", 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 7680 mAh, non-removable | 6580 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glacier Blue, Space Grey | Gray, Blue, Silver |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 160 EUR |
Blackview Oscal Pad 13
- Significantly faster processor
- More efficient chipset
- Potentially better display drivers
- Improved multitasking
- May have slightly higher price (though often comparable)
- Camera quality still limited by budget constraints
Blackview Tab 12
- Very affordable
- Decent for basic tasks
- Lightweight and portable
- Slower processor
- Less efficient chipset
- Slow 10W charging
- Limited performance for gaming or demanding apps
Display Comparison
Both tablets likely feature similar display technology (IPS LCD) and resolution (likely FHD+). The Oscal Pad 13 *might* have slightly better color accuracy or brightness due to its newer chipset allowing for better display drivers, but this is not definitively confirmed without specific display testing data. Screen size is likely comparable, around 10-11 inches.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality on budget tablets is rarely a strong point. Both devices likely have modest rear and front-facing cameras, suitable for basic video calls and casual snapshots. Expect similar image quality, with neither offering exceptional low-light performance. The Oscal Pad 13 *might* have slightly better image processing due to its newer chipset.
Performance
This is where the Oscal Pad 13 shines. The Unisoc T606's Cortex-A75 cores offer a substantial performance boost over the Tab 12's Cortex-A55-only setup. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Pad 13. The 12nm process of the T606 also contributes to better power efficiency.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is likely similar between the two tablets, around 5000-6000mAh. However, the Oscal Pad 13's more efficient chipset could translate to slightly better battery life in real-world usage, despite the increased performance. The Tab 12 has 10W wired charging, which is relatively slow.
Buying Guide
The Blackview Oscal Pad 13 is ideal for users who prioritize performance and want a smoother experience for everyday tasks, light gaming, and media consumption. The Blackview Tab 12 is a good choice for those on a very tight budget who primarily need a tablet for basic web browsing, reading, and light entertainment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Blackview Oscal Pad 13 good for gaming?
It's decent for light gaming. While not a flagship gaming tablet, the T606 chipset handles many popular games at moderate settings. Don't expect to play demanding titles at high graphics settings.
❓ What is the difference between the Unisoc T606 and SC9863A?
The Unisoc T606 is significantly more powerful, featuring Cortex-A75 cores for improved performance. The SC9863A relies solely on Cortex-A55 cores, resulting in a slower and less responsive experience.
