The tablet market is booming, and budget options are increasingly appealing. Today, we're pitting two contenders against each other: the Blackview Oscal Pad 10 and the Xiaomi Redmi Pad. Both promise great value, but which one delivers the best experience?
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad takes the crown thanks to its superior chipset, faster charging, and generally more polished software experience. While the Oscal Pad 10 offers a lower price point, the Redmi Pad's performance and features justify the slight premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | N/A |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | N/A |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 40 | N/A |
| EDGE | - | N/A |
| GPRS | - | N/A |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | - |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | No cellular connectivity |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 29 | 2022, October 04 |
| Status | Available. Released Exp. release 2023, January 09 | Available. Released 2022, October 05 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 241.3 x 160 x 8.9 mm (9.50 x 6.30 x 0.35 in) | 250.5 x 158.1 x 7.1 mm (9.86 x 6.22 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | No |
| Weight | 536 g (1.18 lb) | 465 g (1.03 lb) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~224 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~220 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.1 inches, 295.8 cm2 (~76.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 10.61 inches, 320.4 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 1B colors, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 13 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, 1/4", 1.12µm | 8 MP, f/2.3, 105° (ultrawide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | No |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 6580 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 8000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Mint Green, Moonlight Silver, Diamond Grey | Graphite Gray, Moonlight Silver, Mint Green |
| Models | - | 22081283G |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 0.36 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1529:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-23.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 319077 (v9)
GeekBench: 1852 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Blackview Oscal Pad 10
- Affordable price
- Decent display for the price
- Large screen size
- Underpowered chipset
- Slow charging
- Less polished software
- Lower brightness display
Xiaomi Redmi Pad
- Faster performance
- Brighter display
- Faster charging
- Better software experience
- More efficient chipset
- Slightly higher price
- Camera quality is still basic
Display Comparison
Both tablets feature a 10.1-inch display with a 1529:1 contrast ratio. However, the Redmi Pad boasts a measured 402 nits of brightness, offering better visibility in brighter environments. The Redmi Pad's display also tends to have slightly better color accuracy. While both are LCD panels, the Redmi Pad's implementation is noticeably better.
Camera Comparison
Camera quality is generally not a priority in budget tablets. The Redmi Pad likely has a slightly better camera setup, but neither device is expected to deliver exceptional image quality. Expect decent results for video calls and casual snapshots.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad's Mediatek Helio G99 chipset (6nm) significantly outperforms the Blackview Oscal Pad 10's Unisoc T606 (12nm). The G99's Cortex-A76 cores provide a substantial boost in CPU performance, making the Redmi Pad noticeably faster for demanding apps and games. The Redmi Pad also benefits from a more modern and efficient manufacturing process.
Battery Life
While both tablets likely have similar battery capacities (around 8000mAh), the Redmi Pad's faster 18W charging provides a significant advantage. The Oscal Pad 10's 10W charging will take considerably longer to fully replenish the battery.
Buying Guide
The Blackview Oscal Pad 10 is ideal for users on a tight budget who primarily need a tablet for basic tasks like browsing, reading, and light media consumption. The Xiaomi Redmi Pad is a better choice for those seeking a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and content creation.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Blackview Oscal Pad 10 good for gaming?
The Oscal Pad 10's chipset is not ideal for demanding games. It can handle basic titles, but expect lower frame rates and potential lag.
❓ Which tablet has better build quality?
The Xiaomi Redmi Pad generally has a more premium feel and better build quality than the Oscal Pad 10.
❓ What operating system do these tablets use?
Both tablets run Android, but Xiaomi's MIUI offers a more refined and feature-rich experience compared to Blackview's custom skin.
