The Blackview Oscal C80 and Honor X9a represent distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Oscal C80 aims for affordability, while the X9a brings 5G connectivity and a more powerful chipset to the table. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor X9a is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset offers significantly better performance and future-proofing than the Unisoc T606 in the Oscal C80. While the C80 is cheaper, the X9a’s faster charging and smoother experience justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 | LTE |
| 5G bands | - | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 07 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 14 | Available. Released 2023, January 06 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76 x 8.6 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 7.9 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MagicOS 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), 1.2µm, PDAF
0.3 MP, (depth) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | - | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 40W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5180 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5100 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Early Sunny Snow, Midnight Black, Navy Blue | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green, Midnight Black |
| Models | - | RMO-NX1 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | $ 212.08 |
Blackview Oscal C80
- Lower price point makes it very accessible.
- Potentially longer battery life if equipped with a larger capacity battery.
- Suitable for basic smartphone tasks.
- Unisoc T606 chipset offers limited performance.
- Slower 18W charging.
- Likely lacks 5G connectivity.
Honor X9a
- Snapdragon 695 5G provides significantly better performance.
- Faster 40W wired charging.
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds.
- Higher price compared to the Oscal C80.
- May not have the absolute longest battery life if the Oscal C80 has a significantly larger battery.
- No high refresh rate display.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like OLED vs. LCD) are missing for the Oscal C80, both likely utilize LCD technology given their price points. The Honor X9a’s advantage lies in its potential for higher peak brightness, benefiting outdoor visibility. The absence of high refresh rates on either device suggests a focus on power efficiency over visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the main sensors, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Snapdragon 695’s image signal processor (ISP) generally offers superior image processing capabilities compared to the ISP found in the Unisoc T606. This means the X9a is likely to produce more detailed and dynamic photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests a reliance on software stabilization, which may not be as effective.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor X9a’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) is a clear upgrade over the Blackview Oscal C80’s Unisoc T606 (12nm). The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695 translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The Snapdragon’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, outperform the Cortex-A75 cores (1.6 GHz) in the Unisoc T606, resulting in faster app loading times and a more responsive user experience. Gamers will find the Adreno 619 GPU in the X9a significantly more capable than the integrated GPU in the T606.
Battery Life
The battery capacity isn’t specified for the Oscal C80, but assuming a typical 5000mAh battery (common in this segment), the Honor X9a’s 40W wired charging is a significant advantage. The Oscal C80’s 18W charging will take considerably longer to fully recharge. While a larger battery capacity on the Oscal C80 *could* offset the slower charging, the Snapdragon 695’s superior power efficiency means the X9a will likely deliver comparable, if not better, real-world battery life despite potentially having a smaller cell.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview Oscal C80 if you prioritize absolute affordability and basic smartphone functionality, and 5G connectivity isn't a requirement. It's a suitable option for users who primarily need a phone for calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the Honor X9a if you value smoother performance for multitasking and gaming, faster 5G download speeds, and quicker charging times, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Honor X9a handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 in the Honor X9a is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low for a consistently smooth experience. The Unisoc T606 in the Oscal C80 will struggle with PUBG, even on the lowest settings.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Honor X9a worth the extra cost if I don't have 5G coverage yet?
Even without immediate 5G coverage, the Honor X9a’s 5G modem future-proofs the device. As 5G networks expand, you’ll be ready to take advantage of faster speeds. Additionally, the Snapdragon 695 generally offers better 4G performance than the Unisoc T606.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge each phone from 0%?
With 40W charging, the Honor X9a should fully charge in approximately 60-75 minutes. The Blackview Oscal C80’s 18W charging will likely take over 2 hours, potentially closer to 3, to reach 100%.
❓ Does the Blackview Oscal C80 support software updates?
Blackview’s update track record is less consistent than Honor’s. While the Oscal C80 will likely receive some security patches, major Android version updates are less guaranteed. The Honor X9a, backed by Honor’s software support, is more likely to receive timely updates.
