Looking for a budget-friendly smartphone that doesn't completely compromise on features? The Blackview Oscal C80 and the Google Pixel 4a are both contenders, but they cater to different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Google Pixel 4a wins decisively. While the Oscal C80 offers a lower price point, the Pixel 4a's superior chipset, camera, and software experience provide significantly better overall value and performance, despite its older battery tech.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (3CA) Cat12 600/75 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 07 | 2020, August 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 14 | Available. Released 2020, August 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 76 x 8.6 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.34 in) | 144 x 69.4 x 8.2 mm (5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 143 g (5.04 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~443 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.81 inches, 83.2 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | OLED, HDR |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 470 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 470 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM730 Snapdragon 730G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.0 | Android 10, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), 1.2µm, PDAF
0.3 MP, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired, PD2.0 |
| Type | Li-Ion 5180 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3140 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Early Sunny Snow, Midnight Black, Navy Blue | Just Black, Barely Blue |
| Models | - | G025J, GA02099, G025N |
| Price | About 130 EUR | $ 139.99 / C$ 159.99 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 76h |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 268714 (v8)
GeekBench: 6426 (v4.4), 1626 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Blackview Oscal C80
- Very affordable
- Large display
- Decent battery life (potentially)
- Weaker chipset
- Lower display quality
- Less impressive camera
- Potentially slower charging
Google Pixel 4a
- Excellent camera
- Smooth performance
- Clean Android experience
- Bright and vibrant display
- Good battery life
- Older model
- No expandable storage
- Charging speed could be faster
Display Comparison
The Pixel 4a boasts a brighter display (803 nits vs. likely lower on the Oscal C80) and an impressive infinite contrast ratio, offering richer colors and deeper blacks. While the Oscal C80 might have a larger screen, the Pixel 4a's display quality is noticeably superior.
Camera Comparison
Google's computational photography expertise shines in the Pixel 4a. It consistently delivers excellent image quality, even in challenging lighting conditions. The Oscal C80's camera is likely adequate for basic snapshots, but it won't compete with the Pixel 4a's capabilities.
Performance
The Snapdragon 730G in the Pixel 4a is a significant upgrade over the Unisoc T606 in the Oscal C80. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Pixel 4a. The Pixel 4a's CPU architecture is also more efficient.
Battery Life
While both offer 18W charging, the Pixel 4a's endurance rating of 76h suggests excellent battery life. The Oscal C80's battery capacity is likely smaller, potentially resulting in shorter usage times. PD2.0 support on the Pixel 4a also allows for faster charging with compatible chargers.
Buying Guide
The Blackview Oscal C80 is ideal for users on a very tight budget who prioritize a large screen and basic functionality. The Google Pixel 4a is perfect for those seeking a reliable, compact phone with a fantastic camera and clean Android experience, even if it's a slightly older model.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Blackview Oscal C80 a good phone for gaming?
The Oscal C80's chipset isn't ideal for demanding games. While it can handle some lighter titles, you'll likely experience lag and reduced graphics settings.
❓ Does the Pixel 4a have expandable storage?
No, the Pixel 4a does not have a microSD card slot for expandable storage.
❓ What is the difference between the Unisoc T606 and the Snapdragon 730G?
The Snapdragon 730G is significantly more powerful and efficient than the Unisoc T606, offering better performance and battery life.
