The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, offering incredible value for money. Today, we're pitting the Blackview Oscal C70 against the Samsung Galaxy M32 5G, two contenders vying for your attention. Let's dive into a detailed comparison to see which phone emerges victorious.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy M32 5G takes the win thanks to its superior chipset (Dimensity 720 vs. T606), 5G connectivity, and generally better software support. While the Oscal C70 offers a competitive price, the M32 5G provides a smoother, more future-proof experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 20 | 2021, August 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2021, September 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.2 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.9 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
0.3 MP, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5180 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dim Forest Green, Summer Sky Blue, Stardust Grey | Slate Black, Sky Blue |
| Models | - | SM-M326B, SM-M326B/DS |
| Price | About 80 EUR | About 220 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.48 W/kg (head) |
Blackview Oscal C70
- Very Affordable
- Large Display
- Decent Battery Life
- Lower Performance
- Less Known Brand
- Likely IPS LCD Display
- Slower Charging
Samsung Galaxy M32 5G
- Better Performance (Dimensity 720)
- 5G Connectivity
- Samsung Brand Reliability
- Likely AMOLED Display
- Slightly More Expensive
- 15W Charging is Slow
- Design may be less unique
Display Comparison
Both phones feature large displays, likely around 6.5 inches. The Galaxy M32 5G likely has a slightly better panel (AMOLED vs. likely IPS LCD on the Oscal C70) resulting in more vibrant colors and deeper blacks. Resolution is likely FHD+ on both, offering sharp visuals.
Camera Comparison
The Galaxy M32 5G likely boasts a more versatile camera system, potentially with a higher resolution main sensor and better image processing. While the Oscal C70 may offer decent image quality in good lighting, the Samsung should consistently deliver better results, especially in low-light conditions.
Performance
This is where the Galaxy M32 5G shines. The Dimensity 720's 7nm process and Cortex-A76 cores provide significantly more processing power than the Oscal C70's Unisoc T606 and 12nm process. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance on the Samsung.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have large batteries (around 5000mAh). Battery life should be comparable under moderate usage, but the Galaxy M32 5G's more efficient chipset could give it a slight edge. The 15W charging on the M32 5G is a bit slow compared to some competitors, but likely similar to the Oscal C70.
Buying Guide
The Blackview Oscal C70 is ideal for users prioritizing affordability above all else and who don't need 5G. The Samsung Galaxy M32 5G is a better choice for those wanting a smoother performance, 5G connectivity, and the reliability of a Samsung device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Blackview Oscal C70 worth buying?
If your budget is extremely tight and you don't need 5G, the Oscal C70 can be a decent option for basic tasks. However, consider the Galaxy M32 5G if you can stretch your budget a bit.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy M32 5G have good software support?
Yes, Samsung is known for providing regular software updates and security patches for its devices, offering a more reliable and secure user experience.
