Blackview is known for offering affordable smartphones with surprising features. The Oscal C70 and A53 are two contenders in the budget space, but which one delivers the best value? This detailed comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Blackview Oscal C70 takes the win thanks to its significantly more powerful Unisoc T606 chipset, offering a noticeable performance boost. While the A53 is a solid budget option, the C70's improved processing power makes it the better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - USA |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 40 | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 41, 66 - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 20 | 2023, March 03 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May | Available. Released 2023, March |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.2 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) | 164.6 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.56 inches, 103.9 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 | Android 12, Doke OS 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 16GB 3GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.0 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
0.3 MP, (depth) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | - | 5 MP |
| Triple | - | 12 MP
other unspecified camera |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), unspecified sensors | Unspecified |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5180 mAh, non-removable | 5080 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dim Forest Green, Summer Sky Blue, Stardust Grey | Rock Grey, Murky Black, Starry Blue |
| Price | About 80 EUR | - |
Blackview Oscal C70
- More powerful chipset (Unisoc T606)
- Smoother performance
- Potentially better image processing
- Likely faster charging (unconfirmed)
- May have slightly higher price
- Specific display details are unclear
- Camera quality is still limited by the budget price
Blackview A53
- Very affordable
- Reliable for basic tasks
- Decent battery life
- Weaker chipset (Helio A22)
- Slower performance
- 10W charging is slow
- Limited camera capabilities
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar LCD displays, probably around 6.5 inches with HD+ resolution. Expect decent viewing angles and color reproduction for the price point, but don't anticipate flagship-level brightness or accuracy. The Oscal C70 *might* have a slightly better panel, but this is difficult to confirm without more detailed specifications.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are often similar in this price range. Both phones likely feature a primary camera around 13MP-20MP, with secondary lenses for depth sensing or macro photography. Image quality will be acceptable in good lighting conditions, but expect noise and limited detail in low light. The Oscal C70's more powerful processor *could* lead to slightly better image processing.
Performance
This is where the Oscal C70 shines. Its Unisoc T606 chipset with dual Cortex-A75 cores provides a substantial performance advantage over the A53's quad-core Helio A22. Expect smoother app loading, faster multitasking, and better gaming performance on the C70. The A53 will handle basic tasks adequately, but will struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have batteries in the 4000-5000mAh range. Battery life should be comparable, offering a full day of moderate use. The A53's 10W charging is a drawback compared to potentially faster charging on the C70 (though charging speeds are often unspecified for Blackview phones).
Buying Guide
The Blackview Oscal C70 is ideal for users who prioritize performance and smoother multitasking, even on a budget. The Blackview A53 is a good fit for those seeking a basic, reliable phone primarily for calls, texts, and light usage, and who are extremely budget-conscious.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Blackview Oscal C70 worth the extra money?
Yes, if performance is a priority. The C70's chipset provides a significant upgrade over the A53, making it a more enjoyable experience for most users.
❓ What are the camera capabilities of each phone?
Both phones offer basic camera functionality with around 13-20MP primary sensors. Expect decent results in good lighting, but limited low-light performance.
