The Blackview Color 8 and Ulefone Note 8P represent two approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The Color 8 aims for a more modern experience with a newer chipset, while the Note 8P focuses on providing basic functionality at an extremely competitive price. This comparison dissects their core components to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the Blackview Color 8 is the clear winner. Its Unisoc Tiger T616 chipset offers significantly better performance than the Ulefone Note 8P’s aging Mediatek MT6737, making it suitable for more demanding tasks and ensuring a smoother user experience. While the Note 8P is cheaper, the performance gap is substantial.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - International | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 28, 40, 41 - International | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, January | 2020, June 08. Released 2020, June 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 167.8 x 77.4 x 9.1 mm (6.61 x 3.05 x 0.36 in) | 141.7 x 66.5 x 12 mm (5.58 x 2.62 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Micro-SIM |
| Weight | 214 g (7.55 oz) | 153 g (5.40 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 442 x 960 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~192 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.75 inches, 110.0 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 74.1 cm2 (~78.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6737 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-T720MP1 |
| OS | Android 13, Doke OS 4.0 | Android 10 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76, 0.64µm, PDAF
Secondary unspecified camera | 8 MP, f/2.0, AF
2 MP |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide), 1/4.0, 1.12µm | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Stereo FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | - |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Ion 2700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Ash Gray, Ripple Blue, Wisteria Purple | Black, Amber Sunrise, Midnight Green |
| Price | About 150 EUR | About 70 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.11 W/kg (head) 1.11 W/kg (body) |
Blackview Color 8
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
- More efficient chipset for potentially longer battery life
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Likely better future-proofing due to newer architecture
- May be slightly more expensive than the Ulefone Note 8P
- Display specifications are unknown
Ulefone Note 8P
- Extremely affordable price point
- Simple and easy-to-use interface
- Suitable for basic smartphone tasks
- Potentially longer standby time due to less demanding processor
- Outdated and slow processor
- Less efficient chipset leading to shorter battery life under load
- Limited multitasking capabilities
- Poor gaming performance
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The Color 8’s newer chipset suggests a higher probability of supporting a higher refresh rate, though this is unconfirmed. The Note 8P, with its older processor, is likely limited to a standard 60Hz refresh rate. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, typical of this market segment. Color accuracy is likely to be average on both, prioritizing cost over calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a thorough comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely more for marketing than practical use. Image processing will likely be simpler on the Note 8P due to the limitations of its chipset. The Color 8’s more powerful processor could potentially handle more complex image processing algorithms, resulting in slightly better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. Sensor size is unknown for both, but is a critical factor in image quality.
Performance
The performance disparity is the most significant difference between these two phones. The Blackview Color 8’s Unisoc Tiger T616, built on a 12nm process, features an octa-core configuration with two Cortex-A75 performance cores and six Cortex-A55 efficiency cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 1.8 GHz respectively. This architecture provides a substantial leap in processing power compared to the Ulefone Note 8P’s Mediatek MT6737. The MT6737 is a quad-core processor utilizing older Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 1.3 GHz, fabricated on a less efficient 28nm process. This older node translates to higher power consumption and more heat generation for similar tasks. The T616’s architecture allows for smoother app switching, faster loading times, and a more responsive overall experience. Gamers will find the Color 8 far more capable of handling even moderately demanding titles.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the Ulefone Note 8P’s less efficient 28nm chipset will likely result in shorter battery life compared to the Blackview Color 8, despite potentially having a similar capacity. The Color 8’s 18W wired charging is a notable advantage, allowing for faster top-ups compared to the likely slower charging capabilities of the Note 8P. While 18W isn’t exceptionally fast, it’s a significant improvement over the charging speeds typically found in this price range.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview Color 8 if you need a phone capable of handling multitasking, moderate gaming, and running newer apps without significant lag. It’s ideal for users who want a device that feels responsive and won’t become obsolete quickly. Buy the Ulefone Note 8P if you prioritize absolute affordability and only require basic smartphone functionality like calls, texts, and light web browsing. It’s best suited for users on a very tight budget or as a secondary device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Ulefone Note 8P struggle with modern social media apps like TikTok or Instagram?
Yes, the Mediatek MT6737 processor in the Ulefone Note 8P is quite dated and will likely exhibit noticeable lag and slowdown when running demanding apps like TikTok or Instagram, especially when multitasking. The limited processing power and RAM will struggle to handle the complex algorithms and animations these apps utilize.
❓ Can the Blackview Color 8 handle basic mobile games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Blackview Color 8, with its Unisoc Tiger T616 chipset, can handle basic mobile games like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you’ll likely need to play on lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. Don’t expect a high-end gaming experience, but it’s significantly more capable than the Ulefone Note 8P.
❓ Is the 28nm process of the MT6737 a concern for heat generation and battery drain?
Absolutely. The 28nm fabrication process is significantly less efficient than the 12nm process used in the Unisoc Tiger T616. This means the MT6737 will generate more heat and consume more power for the same tasks, leading to shorter battery life and potential performance throttling under sustained load.
