Blackview BV9300 vs Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X3 Pro takes the crown for overall performance and value, thanks to its Snapdragon 860 chipset and faster charging. However, the BV9300 shines as a durable, rugged option for those needing a phone that can withstand harsh conditions, offering peace of mind where the Poco X3 Pro falls short.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview BV9300 | Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 10 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 10 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 184.6 x 85.6 x 22.8 mm (7.27 x 3.37 x 0.90 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 520 g (1.15 lb) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant Laser rangefinder (up to 40m) Dedicated flashlight (100 lumens) | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 5W reverse wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 15080 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Green | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | - | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 390 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 112h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.1 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 453223 (v8) GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Blackview BV9300
- Rugged and durable design
- Water and dust resistant
- Reverse wired charging
- Potentially longer lifespan due to robust build
- Lower performance compared to Poco X3 Pro
- Unknown battery capacity
- Likely inferior camera quality
- Slower charging
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Superior performance (Snapdragon 860)
- Faster charging
- Excellent battery life (112h endurance rating)
- Potentially better camera quality
- More affordable
- Less durable than BV9300
- More susceptible to damage from drops and water
- May not have the same longevity as a rugged phone
Display Comparison
Both phones boast a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting excellent image depth. However, the Poco X3 Pro likely has a slightly better display overall due to its potentially higher resolution and color accuracy, though specific panel details are needed for a definitive comparison. The BV9300's display is likely more durable due to its ruggedized design.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are not fully detailed for either device. However, the Poco X3 Pro generally has a reputation for better camera performance in its price range. Expect better image processing and potentially more features. The BV9300 likely prioritizes durability over camera quality.
Performance
The Poco X3 Pro's Snapdragon 860 significantly outperforms the BV9300's Helio G99. The Snapdragon 860's architecture and 7nm process provide a noticeable edge in gaming, multitasking, and overall responsiveness. The BV9300 is still capable for everyday tasks, but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Poco X3 Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 112h, suggesting exceptional battery life. While the BV9300's battery capacity is unknown, its rugged design might impact battery efficiency. The Poco X3 Pro also has significantly faster charging (33W with a 59%/100% charge time in 30/59 minutes) compared to the BV9300's 33W wired charging and 5W reverse wired charging.
Buying Guide
The Blackview BV9300 is ideal for outdoor enthusiasts, construction workers, or anyone needing a phone that can survive drops, water, and dust. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is perfect for budget-conscious users who prioritize performance, a vibrant display, and fast charging without sacrificing too much on durability.