Blackview BV9300 vs BV9200: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The BV9200 takes the lead thanks to its significantly faster charging (66W wired, 30W wireless) and brighter display. While the BV9300 boasts a more modern chipset, the BV9200's charging speed and display quality provide a more premium user experience overall.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview BV9300 | Blackview BV9200 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 10 | 2022, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 10 | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 184.6 x 85.6 x 22.8 mm (7.27 x 3.37 x 0.90 in) | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 520 g (1.15 lb) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant Laser rangefinder (up to 40m) Dedicated flashlight (100 lumens) | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~391 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.7 cm2 (~68.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 5W reverse wired | 66W wired 30W wireless |
| Type | 15080 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Green | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 390 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Blackview BV9300
- More modern chipset (Helio G99)
- Slower charging speeds
- Less bright display
- No wireless charging
Blackview BV9200
- Faster charging (66W wired, 30W wireless)
- Brighter display
- Wireless charging support
- Older chipset (Helio G96)
- Potentially slightly lower battery efficiency
Display Comparison
The BV9200's display shines with a measured 481 nits of brightness and a 1423:1 contrast ratio, offering a noticeably more vivid and easier-to-view experience, especially outdoors. The BV9300's display, while functional, lacks the same level of brightness and contrast, potentially making it less enjoyable in bright sunlight. Both likely share similar resolutions and panel types (likely IPS).
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are generally similar across both devices, likely featuring a 48MP main sensor and additional lenses for ultrawide and macro photography. Image quality will likely be comparable, with both offering decent results in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance is likely to be average for both.
Performance
The BV9300's Mediatek Helio G99 chipset (6nm) offers a performance edge over the BV9200's Helio G96 (12nm). The G99's newer architecture and smaller manufacturing process generally translate to better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking and improved gaming capabilities. However, real-world differences might be subtle depending on usage.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature a similar battery capacity (around 5000-6000mAh). However, the BV9200's 66W wired charging and 30W wireless charging provide a significant advantage in charging speed, allowing for much quicker top-ups compared to the BV9300's 33W wired and 5W reverse wired charging.
Buying Guide
The Blackview BV9300 is ideal for users prioritizing processing power and a slightly more efficient chipset for extended use. The Blackview BV9200 is best suited for those who value fast charging, wireless charging capabilities, and a brighter, more vibrant display, even if it means slightly less battery efficiency.