Blackview BV9200 vs Ulefone Armor 17 Pro: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro edges out the BV9200 thanks to its more efficient chipset (6nm vs 12nm), faster wireless charging, and reverse wireless charging. While both are solid choices, the Armor 17 Pro offers a slightly more modern and feature-rich experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview BV9200 | Ulefone Armor 17 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 28 | 2022, October 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 09 | Available. Released 2022, October 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) | 172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm (6.80 x 3.17 x 0.49 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 310 g (10.93 oz) | 290 g (10.23 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | MagSafe compatible accessories | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired 30W wireless | 66W wired, 53% in 15 min 15W wireless Wireless reversed |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Green | Black |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 260 EUR |
Blackview BV9200
- High contrast display
- Fast 66W wired charging
- Rugged design
- Large battery capacity (estimated)
- Less efficient chipset
- Slower 15W wireless charging
- Camera details limited
- Older chipset technology
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- More efficient 6nm chipset
- Faster 30W wireless charging
- Reverse wireless charging
- Potentially better battery life
- Rugged design
- Display details limited
- Camera details limited
- Wireless charging speed not as fast as some flagships
Display Comparison
Both phones feature robust displays designed for outdoor visibility. The BV9200 boasts a high 1423:1 contrast ratio, suggesting excellent blacks and vibrant colors. The Armor 17 Pro's display details are less readily available, but it's likely to be similarly durable and bright. While the BV9200's 481 nits brightness is respectable, the Armor 17 Pro likely matches or exceeds this.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are not fully detailed for either device. However, based on typical configurations for these chipsets, both likely feature a multi-lens setup with a primary sensor around 48MP. Image quality will depend heavily on software optimization, which is difficult to predict without testing. Expect decent performance in good lighting conditions, but struggles in low light.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro holds a significant advantage here. Its Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) is more efficient than the BV9200's Helio G96 (12nm). This translates to better overall performance and improved battery life. Both feature octa-core CPUs with Cortex-A76 cores, but the newer fabrication process of the G99 gives the Armor 17 Pro a noticeable edge.
Battery Life
Both phones offer 66W wired charging, promising quick top-ups. The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro's 30W wireless charging is faster than the BV9200's 15W. The Armor 17 Pro's more efficient chipset also contributes to potentially better battery life overall, despite likely having a similar battery capacity (around 6000-7000mAh).
Buying Guide
The Blackview BV9200 is ideal for users prioritizing a high contrast display and fast-wired charging. The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro is better suited for those needing a more efficient processor, faster wireless charging, and the added convenience of reverse wireless charging.