Blackview BV8800 vs Samsung Galaxy A54: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 offers a superior overall experience with its brighter display, faster processor, and refined software. However, the Blackview BV8800 shines as a durable, long-lasting option for those needing a rugged device, boasting exceptional battery life and reverse charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview BV8800 | Samsung Galaxy A54 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 24 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 10 | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 367 g (12.95 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 8380 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Green | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | - | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 350 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 199h | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1348:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.3 LUFS (Average) | -26.6 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 254849 (v8), 288964 (v9) GeekBench: 1752 (v5.1) GFXBench: 10fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 506678 (v9) GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6) GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Blackview BV8800
- Exceptional battery life
- Rugged and durable design
- Reverse wired charging
- High contrast ratio display
- Lower performance compared to A54
- Dimmer display
- Camera specs unknown, likely inferior
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Faster processor and smoother performance
- Superior camera system (expected)
- Refined software experience
- Shorter battery life compared to BV8800
- Less rugged design
- Slower charging speed
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54 takes the display crown with its measured 980 nits peak brightness and an effectively 'infinite' contrast ratio. The BV8800's 501 nits is respectable, but noticeably dimmer. While the BV8800's 1348:1 contrast ratio is good, it doesn't match the A54's visual pop. The A54's Super AMOLED panel also offers richer colors and deeper blacks.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Samsung Galaxy A54 is expected to have a superior camera system. Samsung's image processing is generally excellent, and the A54 likely features better sensors and lenses. The BV8800's camera is likely adequate for basic photography, but won't compete with the A54's capabilities. Specific camera specs are missing for the BV8800, further highlighting the A54's advantage.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A54's Exynos 1380 (5nm) chipset provides significantly better performance than the BV8800's Mediatek Helio G96 (12nm). The A54's Cortex-A78 cores offer a noticeable speed boost for demanding tasks and gaming. While the BV8800 is capable, the A54 delivers a smoother, more responsive experience.
Battery Life
The Blackview BV8800 boasts an incredible endurance rating of 199h, significantly outperforming the Galaxy A54's 119h. This suggests vastly superior battery life for the BV8800. The BV8800 also includes reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up other devices.
Buying Guide
The Blackview BV8800 is ideal for outdoor enthusiasts, construction workers, or anyone needing a phone that can withstand harsh conditions. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is a great choice for everyday users who prioritize a smooth performance, excellent camera, and a vibrant display.