Blackview BV8800 vs Cat S75: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Cat S75 boasts a significantly more powerful chipset and wireless charging, offering a smoother experience. However, the BV8800's exceptional battery life and potentially more robust build make it a strong contender. Ultimately, the Cat S75 wins for performance, while the BV8800 excels in endurance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview BV8800 | Cat S75 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 23, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 24 | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, January 10 | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 367 g (12.95 oz) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | 8380 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Green | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | About 350 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 199h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1348:1 (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -29.3 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 254849 (v8), 288964 (v9) GeekBench: 1752 (v5.1) GFXBench: 10fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Blackview BV8800
- Exceptional battery life (199h endurance)
- Potentially more rugged build
- Fast wired charging (33W)
- Reverse wired charging
- Older chipset (Helio G96)
- Less powerful performance
- Camera details unclear
- Lacks wireless charging
Cat S75
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 930)
- Wireless charging
- Better performance for gaming and multitasking
- Modern chipset
- Likely shorter battery life than BV8800
- Ruggedness may be less emphasized
- Camera details unclear
Display Comparison
Both phones feature durable displays, likely with Gorilla Glass protection, though specifics are not detailed. The BV8800 boasts a high contrast ratio of 1348:1 and a measured brightness of 501 nits, suggesting a vibrant and easily viewable screen even in sunlight. The Cat S75's display details are less clear, but it likely prioritizes durability over peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse for both devices. Both are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities. Given the chipset difference, the Cat S75 likely has a more capable camera system, potentially offering better image processing and video recording quality. However, without specific sensor details, a definitive comparison is difficult.
Performance
The Cat S75's Mediatek Dimensity 930 chipset (6nm) is a clear winner over the BV8800's Helio G96 (12nm). The Dimensity 930 offers significantly better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and improved gaming capabilities. The BV8800 is adequate for everyday tasks but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The BV8800's claimed endurance rating of 199h is astonishing, suggesting exceptional battery life. The Cat S75, while likely having a decent battery, doesn't match this level of endurance. The Cat S75 does offer wireless charging, a convenience the BV8800 lacks.
Buying Guide
The Blackview BV8800 is ideal for users prioritizing extreme battery life and a potentially more rugged design, even if it means sacrificing some processing power. The Cat S75 is better suited for those who need a faster, more responsive phone with wireless charging and a more modern chipset, willing to trade some battery endurance.