Blackview BV8200 vs. Ulefone Power Armor 19T: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Ulefone Power Armor 19T is the better choice. While both phones share the same CPU core configuration, the 19T’s Helio G99 chipset and significantly faster 66W charging (reaching 52% in 30 minutes) provide a noticeable advantage in daily use and convenience, offsetting the BV8200’s impressive battery endurance rating.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview BV8200 | Ulefone Power Armor 19T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 31 | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 31 | Available. Released 2023, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 174.6 x 81.1 x 16.5 mm (6.87 x 3.19 x 0.65 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 370 g (13.05 oz) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~72.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, Doke OS 4.0 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.57", PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/3.0" | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired 5W reverse wired | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | 8800 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Orange | Black |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 118:45h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Blackview BV8200
- Exceptional battery endurance (118:45h)
- High battery cycle count (800 cycles)
- Rugged build quality
- Slower charging speed (45W)
- Older chipset (Helio G100)
Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- Faster charging (66W, 52% in 30min)
- Wireless charging support
- More modern chipset (Helio G99)
- Battery endurance rating not provided
- Potentially lower battery lifespan compared to BV8200
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, but given the market segment, both likely feature durable, high-brightness LCD panels. The focus here isn't on cutting-edge display tech, but on visibility in direct sunlight and scratch resistance. Expect both to prioritize practicality over pixel density.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but within this price bracket, expect a primary sensor to be the key differentiator. Without specific megapixel counts or sensor sizes, it’s difficult to declare a winner. However, the Ulefone brand often emphasizes camera capabilities in its marketing, suggesting a potentially more refined image processing pipeline. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage, but is not specified.
Performance
Both the Blackview BV8200 and Ulefone Power Armor 19T utilize an octa-core CPU with the same core configuration: 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. However, the Ulefone 19T’s Helio G99 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers a slight architectural advantage over the BV8200’s Helio G100. While the core speeds are identical, the G99 generally exhibits better sustained performance and efficiency. This translates to smoother multitasking and potentially higher frame rates in demanding games. The 6nm node allows for better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended use.
Battery Life
The Blackview BV8200 boasts an impressive 118:45h endurance rating and a remarkable 800 charge cycles, indicating a focus on long-term battery health. The Ulefone Power Armor 19T, while lacking a specific endurance rating, compensates with significantly faster charging: 66W wired, capable of reaching 52% charge in just 30 minutes. It also adds 15W wireless charging and 5W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the BV8200. The BV8200’s 45W wired charging is adequate, but the 19T’s speed is a clear convenience advantage. The 800 charge cycle rating of the BV8200 suggests a longer lifespan for the battery itself, even with frequent use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview BV8200 if you prioritize maximum battery longevity and 800 charge cycles, potentially extending the phone's usable life over several years. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 19T if you value faster charging speeds, wireless charging capabilities, and a slightly more modern chipset, making it ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly while on the go.