Blackview BV8200 vs. Cat S75: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life and value, the Blackview BV8200 is the clear winner. Its exceptional 118:45h endurance significantly outweighs the Cat S75’s performance advantage. However, users needing more processing power for intensive applications will find the Cat S75 a better fit.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview BV8200 | Cat S75 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 23, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 31 | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 31 | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 174.6 x 81.1 x 16.5 mm (6.87 x 3.19 x 0.65 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 370 g (13.05 oz) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~72.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 14, Doke OS 4.0 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.57", PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/3.0" | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1" | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired 5W reverse wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | 8800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Orange | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | About 290 EUR | About 600 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 118:45h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Blackview BV8200
- Exceptional battery life (118:45h endurance)
- Faster 45W wired charging
- 5W reverse wired charging for accessories
- Less powerful processor than the Cat S75
- Potentially limited performance in demanding apps
Cat S75
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 930 chipset
- Wireless charging convenience
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Shorter battery life compared to the BV8200
- Slower 15W wireless charging
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the rugged focus, both likely utilize durable, scratch-resistant glass. The Cat S75, positioned as a slightly more premium device, may benefit from a higher peak brightness for outdoor visibility. The BV8200's display will likely be tuned for efficiency to maximize battery life, potentially at the expense of color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference suggests the Cat S75 will have a more capable image signal processor (ISP), leading to better image processing, noise reduction, and potentially faster capture speeds. The BV8200 will likely focus on providing a functional camera for documentation, while the Cat S75 aims for a more refined photographic experience. The absence of details makes it impossible to assess low-light performance or video capabilities.
Performance
The Cat S75’s Mediatek Dimensity 930 represents a significant step up in processing power compared to the Blackview BV8200’s Helio G100. The Dimensity 930 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores (vs. A76 in the G100), offering improved single-core performance crucial for responsive UI and app loading. Both chipsets are fabricated on a 6nm process, suggesting similar efficiency, but the architectural advantage of the A78 cores in the Cat S75 will translate to a noticeable performance difference in tasks like video editing or gaming. The G100 is still capable for everyday tasks, but will show its limits with more demanding workloads.
Battery Life
The Blackview BV8200’s standout feature is its incredible 118:45h endurance, a testament to its optimized hardware and software. While the Cat S75’s battery capacity is unknown, its more powerful Dimensity 930 chipset will consume more power. The BV8200’s 45W wired charging is significantly faster than the Cat S75’s 15W wireless charging, allowing for quicker top-ups when a power source is available. The Cat S75’s wireless charging offers convenience, but at the cost of charging speed. The BV8200 also includes 5W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview BV8200 if you need a phone that can reliably last for days on a single charge, are frequently outdoors without access to power, or prioritize affordability. Buy the Cat S75 if you prefer a smoother experience with more demanding apps, value wireless charging convenience, and are willing to trade some battery life for increased processing power.