Blackview BV8100 vs. Nokia XR20: A Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and faster charging, the Blackview BV8100 is the clear winner. Its Helio G99 chipset offers a noticeable advantage in demanding tasks. However, the Nokia XR20’s 5G connectivity and wireless charging provide compelling features for those needing broader network access and convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview BV8100 | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 175.8 x 81.2 x 18.1 mm (6.92 x 3.20 x 0.71 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 360 g (12.70 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~71.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 440 nits | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.57", PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired 5W reverse wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 8800 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Green, Orange | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
Blackview BV8100
- Faster charging with 45W wired support
- More powerful processor (Helio G99)
- Potentially better image processing
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- No wireless charging
Nokia XR20
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Wireless charging for added convenience
- Nokia’s software update commitment
- Slower processor (Snapdragon 480)
- Slower wired charging (18W)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a cutting-edge display. Details are missing, but assuming both utilize IPS LCD panels, the comparison hinges on resolution and brightness. The BV8100’s focus on performance suggests a potentially higher refresh rate, though unconfirmed. The XR20’s display is likely tuned for outdoor visibility, a common trait in rugged phones, but without specific nit ratings, it’s difficult to assess its superiority. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both to contribute to structural integrity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference hints at better image processing capabilities on the BV8100. The G99’s ISP is likely more advanced, allowing for faster image capture and potentially better low-light performance. The presence of a dedicated image signal processor (ISP) within the G99 will likely yield more detailed and vibrant photos compared to the XR20’s Snapdragon 480. We can assume both phones will include a standard array of lenses, but the BV8100’s processing power gives it an edge.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Blackview BV8100’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) offers a significant performance advantage over the Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm). The G99’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, are more powerful than the XR20’s Kryo 460 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 6nm process node of the G99 also translates to better power efficiency and potentially less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. While the XR20 benefits from 5G, the G99’s superior CPU and GPU performance will be more noticeable in everyday tasks and gaming.
Battery Life
The Blackview BV8100’s 45W wired charging is a substantial advantage over the Nokia XR20’s 18W wired charging. This translates to significantly faster charging times, crucial for users who need to quickly top up their battery on the go. The XR20 compensates with 15W wireless charging, offering convenience, but it’s slower overall. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the G99’s 6nm efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery size, providing comparable real-world battery life despite the charging speed disparity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview BV8100 if you need a rugged phone for demanding tasks like mobile gaming, running resource-intensive apps, or frequent outdoor photography where quick charging is essential. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prioritize 5G connectivity for remote work or streaming, value wireless charging convenience, and appreciate Nokia’s commitment to software updates and a cleaner Android experience.