Blackview BV7300 vs. Ulefone Armor 9E: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-term reliability and battery life, the Blackview BV7300 is the better choice. Its impressive 166:39h endurance and 800 charge cycles significantly outweigh the Ulefone Armor 9E’s marginally faster CPU, especially considering the Armor 9E’s slower charging speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview BV7300 | Ulefone Armor 9E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 19, 26, 28, 40, 41, 38, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, April | 2020, September 08. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 186 x 85 x 24 mm (7.32 x 3.35 x 0.94 in) | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm (6.62 x 3.23 x 0.59 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 528 g (1.16 lb) | 324 g (11.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 720 x 1604 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.2 cm2 (~67.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~70.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 700 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G81 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 14, DokeOS 4.0 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF 20 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/2.8", 2 infrared night vision lights | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, coulombmeter |
| - | Endoscope mount (camera sold separately) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired 7W reverse wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 15000 mAh | Li-Po 6600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black |
| Price | - | About 290 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 166:39h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Blackview BV7300
- Exceptional battery life (166:39h endurance)
- Fast 45W wired charging
- Long-lasting battery health (800 charge cycles)
- Slightly slower CPU than the Armor 9E
- Display specifications unknown
Ulefone Armor 9E
- More powerful CPU (Helio P90)
- Potentially better gaming performance
- Slightly faster application loading
- Significantly slower 18W charging
- Battery endurance data unavailable
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, we can assume both utilize IPS LCD panels. The Armor 9E’s Helio P90 chipset *could* support higher refresh rates, but this isn’t confirmed. The BV7300’s focus on endurance suggests a display tuned for efficiency, potentially at the expense of peak brightness. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of rugged designs prioritizing protection over aesthetics.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are absent, making a detailed comparison impossible. However, given the rugged phone segment, both devices likely prioritize durability over cutting-edge camera technology. Expect competent main sensors, but image quality will likely be average. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing gimmick, offering minimal practical benefit. Image processing will likely differ, with Blackview potentially focusing on natural colors and Ulefone aiming for more vibrant, saturated images.
Performance
The Ulefone Armor 9E’s Mediatek Helio P90 (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) offers a slight CPU clock speed advantage over the Blackview BV7300’s Helio G81 (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). While both are 12nm chips, the P90’s higher clock speeds translate to quicker app launches and smoother multitasking. However, the G81 benefits from newer architecture refinements, potentially offering better sustained performance under load. The Armor 9E’s GPU is also likely more capable, making it the better choice for casual gaming, but the BV7300’s efficiency could lead to less thermal throttling during extended use.
Battery Life
This is where the Blackview BV7300 truly shines. Its 166:39h endurance rating is exceptional for a rugged phone, and the 800 charge cycle claim suggests long-term battery health. The Ulefone Armor 9E lacks this endurance data, but its 18W charging is significantly slower than the BV7300’s 45W wired charging. While the Armor 9E might have a larger capacity battery (unconfirmed), the BV7300’s efficiency and faster charging will likely result in less downtime and a more convenient user experience. The BV7300 also offers 7W reverse wired charging, a useful feature for topping up accessories in the field.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview BV7300 if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, and if you frequently work or recreate in environments where access to power is limited. It’s ideal for construction workers, outdoor enthusiasts on multi-day trips, or anyone who simply dislikes daily charging. Buy the Ulefone Armor 9E if you prioritize slightly faster application loading times and occasional gaming, and are willing to compromise on battery life and charging speed. It’s a better fit for users who need a rugged phone but have more frequent access to power outlets.