Blackview BV6300 Pro vs. Ulefone Armor 9E: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Ulefone Armor 9E is the better choice. Its Helio P90 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the BV6300 Pro’s Helio P70. However, the BV6300 Pro remains a viable option for users on a tighter budget who don't demand intensive processing power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview BV6300 Pro | Ulefone Armor 9E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, February 24. Released 2020, May | 2020, September 08. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 159.6 x 78.2 x 12.8 mm (6.28 x 3.08 x 0.50 in) | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm (6.62 x 3.23 x 0.59 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 230 g (8.11 oz) | 324 g (11.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~67.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~70.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771T Helio P70 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, coulombmeter |
| - | Endoscope mount (camera sold separately) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired 10W wireless | 18W wired |
| Type | 4380 mAh | Li-Po 6600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Green, Yellow | Black |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 290 EUR |
Blackview BV6300 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Wireless charging support
- Rugged design for durability
- Less powerful processor
- Potentially slower app loading times
- May struggle with demanding games
Ulefone Armor 9E
- More powerful Helio P90 chipset
- Improved multitasking and app responsiveness
- Better image processing capabilities
- Higher price compared to BV6300 Pro
- No wireless charging support
- Potentially similar battery life despite efficiency gains
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market segment, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels for durability and visibility in direct sunlight. The BV6300 Pro, being potentially the more budget-focused option, may have slightly lower peak brightness or narrower viewing angles. Color accuracy is likely similar, prioritizing practicality over color fidelity. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both to contribute to drop protection.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the image processing capabilities will differ based on the chipset’s ISP (Image Signal Processor). The Helio P90 in the Armor 9E has a more advanced ISP, potentially resulting in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The presence of a larger main sensor (if present, and not specified) would further favor the Armor 9E. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering minimal practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Ulefone Armor 9E’s MediaTek Helio P90 utilizes a more modern architecture with 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, compared to the Blackview BV6300 Pro’s Helio P70 with 4x 2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. The P90’s A75 cores offer significantly improved single-core performance, translating to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both are 12nm chips, the P90’s architecture is more efficient, potentially leading to better sustained performance under load. This benefits users who frequently switch between apps or engage in light gaming.
Battery Life
Both devices offer 18W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds. The actual 0-100% charge time will depend on battery capacity (not provided). However, the Helio P90’s improved efficiency in the Armor 9E could translate to slightly better battery life during typical usage, even with a similar capacity battery. The inclusion of 10W wireless charging on the BV6300 Pro is a convenience feature the Armor 9E lacks, appealing to users who prefer cable-free charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview BV6300 Pro if you need a highly durable phone for basic tasks like communication, navigation, and occasional photography, and prioritize affordability. Buy the Ulefone Armor 9E if you prefer a rugged device capable of handling more demanding applications, moderate gaming, and benefit from a more responsive user interface, even if it comes at a slightly higher price.