Blackview BL9000 Pro vs Ulefone Power Armor 19T: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Blackview BL9000 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8020 chipset delivers a substantial performance advantage over the Ulefone’s Helio G99, and the 120W charging is significantly faster. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 19T offers a compelling value proposition for those on a tighter budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview BL9000 Pro | Ulefone Power Armor 19T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Available. Released 2023, March 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 179.5 x 82.6 x 17 mm (7.07 x 3.25 x 0.67 in) | 175.2 x 83.4 x 18.8 mm (6.90 x 3.28 x 0.74 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 412 g (14.53 oz) | 409 g (14.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant Accessory connector (ulefone endoscope, microscope) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 7 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 14, Doke-OS 4.0 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Hexa-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), 1/1.57", PDAF 13 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module), 160x120 | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 5 MP (macro) FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) 5 MP (for thermal module) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.8" | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, magnetic connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired 5W reverse wired | 66W wired, 52% in 30 min 15W wireless 5W wireless reversed |
| Type | 8800 mAh | Li-Po 9600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Splendid Gold, Interstellar Black | Black |
| Price | About 550 EUR | About 440 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 87:06h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (272 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Blackview BL9000 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 8020)
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging
- Longer battery endurance (87:06h)
- No wireless charging
- Potentially higher price
Ulefone Power Armor 19T
- More affordable price point
- Wireless charging support (15W)
- Wireless reverse charging support (5W)
- Slower processor (Helio G99)
- Slower wired charging (66W)
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the BL9000 Pro's positioning as a higher-end device, it's reasonable to expect a panel with higher peak brightness and potentially a higher refresh rate. The Ulefone Power Armor 19T likely utilizes a more cost-effective display, prioritizing durability over visual fidelity. Bezels are likely similar given the rugged design constraints of both.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference suggests the BL9000 Pro will have a more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor), enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Ulefone Power Armor 19T will likely rely on software optimization to compensate for its less powerful ISP. We can assume both will feature multiple cameras, but the BL9000 Pro is more likely to include features like 4K video recording and advanced image stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Blackview BL9000 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6nm) features a more modern CPU architecture – Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz – compared to the Ulefone Power Armor 19T’s Helio G99 (6nm) with its Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to a noticeable performance uplift in CPU-intensive tasks for the Blackview. The Dimensity 8020’s superior GPU will also provide a better gaming experience. While both are 6nm chips, the architectural improvements in the Dimensity 8020 offer better efficiency and sustained performance.
Battery Life
The Blackview BL9000 Pro boasts an impressive 87:06h endurance, suggesting a large battery capacity optimized by the efficient Dimensity 8020. Crucially, its 120W wired charging is a game-changer, significantly reducing charging times compared to the Ulefone Power Armor 19T’s 66W charging (52% in 30 minutes). The Ulefone does offer 15W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Blackview, and 5W wireless reverse charging on both. The BL9000 Pro's 800 charge cycles suggest a longer lifespan for the battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview BL9000 Pro if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously, and if minimizing charging downtime is critical. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 19T if you prioritize affordability and a balance of ruggedness and everyday functionality, and are willing to trade some processing power for a lower price point.