Blackview BL9000 Pro vs. Cat S62 Pro: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Blackview BL9000 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8020 chipset offers significantly more processing power, coupled with an exceptional 87-hour battery endurance and 120W charging. While the Cat S62 Pro remains a durable option, its aging Snapdragon 660 struggles to compete in demanding tasks.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview BL9000 Pro | Cat S62 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 400/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April | 2020, June 28. Released 2020, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 179.5 x 82.6 x 17 mm (7.07 x 3.25 x 0.67 in) | 158.5 x 76.7 x 11.9 mm (6.24 x 3.02 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 412 g (14.53 oz) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 35 mins) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, Mohs level 7 | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2160 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~424 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~73.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~69.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 14, Doke-OS 4.0 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Thermal imaging, heat palettes, temp. spot meter, LED flash |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), 1/1.57", PDAF 13 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF FLIR thermal camera (Lepton 3.5 module), 160x120 | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.8" | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired 5W reverse wired | - |
| Type | 8800 mAh | Li-Ion 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Splendid Gold, Interstellar Black | Black |
| Price | About 550 EUR | About 530 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 87:06h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class B | - |
| Free fall | Class A (272 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Blackview BL9000 Pro
- Significantly faster processor for demanding tasks
- Exceptional battery life (87:06h endurance)
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Likely more advanced display technology
- May be larger and heavier due to larger battery
- Potential software bloat (typical of Blackview)
Cat S62 Pro
- Proven rugged design and durability
- Reliable, if slower, performance for basic tasks
- Established brand reputation in the rugged phone market
- Potentially more compact form factor
- Outdated Snapdragon 660 processor struggles with modern apps
- Slow charging speeds
- Likely inferior display quality
- Limited future software updates
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but given the market positioning, we can infer differences. The Cat S62 Pro likely features an older LCD panel, prioritizing durability over visual fidelity. The Blackview BL9000 Pro, being a newer device, likely incorporates a more advanced panel – potentially AMOLED – offering superior contrast and color accuracy. The absence of refresh rate data suggests neither phone prioritizes a fluid visual experience, focusing instead on power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but the focus should be on the primary sensors. While both phones likely feature multiple cameras, the image quality will heavily depend on the main sensor and image processing capabilities. Without specific sensor sizes or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given the BL9000 Pro’s overall focus on modern hardware, it’s reasonable to assume a more advanced camera system with better low-light performance and dynamic range. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and unlikely to deliver significant photographic value.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Blackview BL9000 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6nm) is a modern, octa-core processor built on a smaller fabrication node than the Cat S62 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). This translates to significantly improved CPU and GPU performance, as well as better thermal efficiency. The Dimensity 8020’s Cortex-A78 cores (2.6 GHz) are considerably faster than the Snapdragon 660’s Kryo 260 Gold cores (2.2 GHz), resulting in snappier app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience. The 6nm process also means the BL9000 Pro will generate less heat under load, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling.
Battery Life
Battery life is a key differentiator. The Blackview BL9000 Pro boasts an impressive 87:06h endurance, suggesting a large battery capacity optimized for extended use. Crucially, its 120W wired charging is a game-changer, allowing for incredibly fast top-ups. The Cat S62 Pro lacks this rapid charging capability, relying on slower charging speeds. While the exact mAh capacity of the Cat S62 Pro is unknown, the BL9000 Pro’s combination of endurance and charging speed provides a significant advantage for users who demand all-day battery life and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview BL9000 Pro if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding applications like mobile gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously, and if fast charging and long battery life are critical. Buy the Cat S62 Pro if you prioritize a proven, reliable rugged design and are primarily focused on basic communication and light usage, and are comfortable with a less powerful processor.