Blackview BL8800 vs. Ulefone Power Armor 13: A Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Blackview BL8800 emerges as the better choice. Its Dimensity 700 chipset, built on a more efficient 7nm process, provides a performance edge over the Ulefone Power Armor 13’s 12nm Helio G95, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While the Power Armor 13 boasts wireless charging, the BL8800’s faster wired charging and overall processing power make it the more compelling option.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview BL8800 | Ulefone Power Armor 13 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 09 | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 09 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) | 183.7 x 85.4 x 20.8 mm (7.23 x 3.36 x 0.82 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 367 g (12.95 oz) | 492 g (1.08 lb) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810H compliant | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~386 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Penta | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide) 20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | - |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, baroceptor, coulombmeter |
| - | Infrared distance measure (error range: 1~20m, ±10mm; 20~40m, ±25mm) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min Reverse wired | 33W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wireless |
| Type | 8380 mAh | Li-Po 13200 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Green | Black |
| Price | About 480 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 296h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1306:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.3 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 294194 (v8), 351678 (v9) GeekBench: 1610 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Blackview BL8800
- More efficient Dimensity 700 chipset
- Faster wired charging (90 minutes to full)
- Potential for better sustained performance
- Lacks wireless charging
- Camera specs are unknown
Ulefone Power Armor 13
- Wireless charging support (15W)
- Higher peak display brightness (401 nits)
- Long endurance rating (296 hours)
- Less efficient Helio G95 chipset
- Slower overall performance
- 12nm process may lead to throttling
Display Comparison
Both the Blackview BL8800 and Ulefone Power Armor 13 share a contrast ratio of 1306:1, suggesting similar visual depth. However, the Ulefone Power Armor 13’s measured peak brightness of 401 nits is a key advantage, ensuring better visibility in direct sunlight. While both displays are adequate, the Power Armor 13’s higher brightness will be noticeable for outdoor use. Details regarding panel technology (IPS, AMOLED) and resolution are missing, but given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCDs.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization. This makes a direct comparison difficult. Without further information, it’s reasonable to assume both phones offer a standard camera experience for their price range. The absence of details suggests neither phone is positioned as a photography powerhouse, and the inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is likely more for marketing than practical use.
Performance
The Blackview BL8800’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) holds a significant architectural advantage over the Ulefone Power Armor 13’s Helio G95 (12nm). The smaller 7nm node allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, meaning the BL8800 should run cooler and maintain performance for longer periods. While both CPUs feature a similar core configuration – octa-core with 2x Cortex-A76 and 6x Cortex-A55 – the Dimensity 700’s superior process node and integrated 5G modem give it a clear edge in overall performance and future-proofing. The G95 is a capable chip, but it’s a generation behind and less efficient.
Battery Life
The Ulefone Power Armor 13 boasts an endurance rating of 296 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. However, this rating doesn’t account for usage patterns. Both phones offer 33W wired charging, with the BL8800 achieving 31% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 90 minutes. The Power Armor 13 adds 15W wireless charging and 5W reverse wireless charging, providing added convenience. While the Power Armor 13’s wireless charging is a unique feature, the BL8800’s faster wired charging speed and more efficient chipset may offset the larger battery capacity in real-world scenarios.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview BL8800 if you need a rugged phone with a responsive user experience and prioritize performance for tasks like gaming or demanding applications. Buy the Ulefone Power Armor 13 if you absolutely require wireless charging and value a potentially longer endurance rating, even if it comes at the cost of some processing speed. Consider the Power Armor 13 if you frequently work in environments where access to a wired charger is limited.