The rugged smartphone market is heating up, offering durable devices for outdoor enthusiasts and demanding work environments. The Blackview BL8800 and Oukitel WP19 both aim to deliver this resilience, but differ significantly in their core processing power and charging speeds. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone offers the best value for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Blackview BL8800 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 700 chipset, built on a more efficient 7nm process, provides a noticeable advantage over the Oukitel WP19’s 12nm Helio G95, despite similar CPU core configurations.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 66 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 09 | 2022, June |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 09 | Available. Released 2022, July |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 176.2 x 83.5 x 17.7 mm (6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 in) | - |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 367 g (12.95 oz) | - |
| | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m
MIL-STD-810H compliant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~70.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, Doke-OS 3.0 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 117˚ (ultrawide)
20 MP, f/1.8, (IR camera), 2 IR emitters
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
20 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 4 infrared night vision lights
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | - |
| 35mm jack | No | Unspecified |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Unspecified |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 31% in 30 min, 100% in 90 min
Reverse wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 8380 mAh | Li-Po 21000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Green | Blue, Camo, Camouflage |
| Price | About 480 EUR | About 380 EUR |
Blackview BL8800
- More efficient Dimensity 700 chipset
- Faster 33W charging (100% in 90 mins)
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Display specifications unknown
- Camera details limited
Oukitel WP19
- Potentially lower price point
- Rugged design for outdoor use
- 33W wired charging
- Less efficient Helio G95 chipset
- Likely more thermal throttling
- Slower charging time (compared to BL8800)
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points of both phones, we can expect both to utilize IPS LCD panels. The focus here will likely be on durability rather than display quality. Users should expect adequate viewing angles and color reproduction for outdoor visibility, but not flagship-level accuracy. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both devices, prioritizing drop protection.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a comprehensive comparison is impossible. However, rugged phones in this price bracket often prioritize megapixel count over sensor size and image quality. It’s reasonable to assume both phones will feature a multi-camera setup, but image processing algorithms and low-light performance will be key differentiators. Users should focus on independent reviews and sample photos to assess the actual camera capabilities, rather than relying solely on megapixel numbers.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Blackview BL8800’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) offers a more modern architecture and a smaller fabrication process compared to the Oukitel WP19’s Helio G95 (12nm). While both CPUs feature the same core configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – the 7nm process of the Dimensity 700 translates to better power efficiency and potentially lower thermal throttling under sustained load. This means the BL8800 is likely to maintain higher clock speeds for longer periods during gaming or intensive applications. The GPU performance will also favor the Dimensity 700, though the real-world difference may not be dramatic for casual users.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 33W wired charging, but the Blackview BL8800 boasts a faster charging time – 31% in 30 minutes and 100% in 90 minutes – compared to the Oukitel WP19’s unspecified full charge time. This suggests a more optimized charging implementation or a slightly smaller battery capacity in the BL8800. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the more efficient Dimensity 700 chipset in the BL8800 will likely contribute to longer real-world battery life, even with a similar capacity to the WP19.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview BL8800 if you need a rugged phone that can handle demanding tasks like gaming or video editing without significant throttling, and if quick top-ups are important. Buy the Oukitel WP19 if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are primarily focused on basic smartphone functions like calls, messaging, and light social media use, accepting a trade-off in processing efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G95 in the Oukitel WP19 struggle with graphically demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Helio G95 is capable of running these games, but you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The 12nm process and less efficient architecture mean it's more prone to thermal throttling, potentially leading to performance drops during extended gaming sessions. The Blackview BL8800’s Dimensity 700 will offer a more consistent gaming experience.
❓ Does the 33W charging on both phones support Power Delivery (PD) or Quick Charge (QC) standards?
While both phones support 33W charging, the specific charging standards (PD or QC) aren't specified. It's likely they utilize a proprietary charging protocol, meaning you may not achieve the full 33W charging speed with third-party chargers. Using the included charger is recommended for optimal charging performance.
❓ How does the ruggedness of these phones compare in terms of IP rating and drop protection?
Neither device's IP rating is provided in the context data. However, both are marketed as rugged phones, so they should offer protection against dust and water. Drop protection will depend on the materials used in construction and the phone's overall design. Look for independent drop test videos to assess the real-world durability of each device.
