Blackview BL7000 vs. Cat S75: A Deep Dive into Rugged Smartphone Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day (and multi-day) battery life and a solid mid-range performance, the Blackview BL7000 is the better choice. Its 118:45h endurance significantly outpaces the Cat S75, and the Dimensity 6300 offers a capable experience. However, users demanding maximum processing power for demanding tasks will find the Cat S75's Dimensity 930 more appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview BL7000 | Cat S75 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 23, 28, 38, 40, 41, 75, 77, 78, 255, 256 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, May | 2023, February 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2023, July |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 182.2 x 86 x 14.5 mm (7.17 x 3.39 x 0.57 in) | 171 x 80 x 11.9 mm (6.73 x 3.15 x 0.47 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 357 g (12.59 oz) | 268 g (9.45 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69 dust/water resistant (up to 5m for 35 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~69.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~76.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 750 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 930 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG BXM-8-256 |
| OS | Android 15, DokeOS 4.1 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF 20 MP, f/2.0, (night vision), 1/2.8", 2 infrared night vision lights Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | Emergency SOS via satellite (Bullitt Satellite Connect service) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired 6W reverse wired | 15W wireless |
| Type | 7500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black |
| Models | - | BM1S1B |
| Price | $ 205.99 / € 226.99 / £ 229.99 | About 600 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 118:45h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class A (270 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Blackview BL7000
- Exceptional battery life (118:45h endurance)
- Modern Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset
- 33W wired and 6W reverse wired charging
- Lacks wireless charging
- Potentially lower peak performance compared to the Cat S75
Cat S75
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 930 chipset
- Convenient 15W wireless charging
- Potentially better image processing
- Significantly shorter battery life expected
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither device provides display specifications, but given their rugged focus, we can assume both utilize durable, scratch-resistant glass. The absence of LTPO technology suggests neither will offer adaptive refresh rates for power saving. The real differentiator will likely be peak brightness, a crucial factor for outdoor visibility, which is currently unknown for both. Bezels are expected to be functional rather than minimal, prioritizing protection over aesthetics.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference suggests the Cat S75 will have a more capable ISP (Image Signal Processor), potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. The absence of information regarding sensor size and OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) makes it impossible to definitively declare a winner. We can assume both phones will include a standard array of lenses, but the quality will depend heavily on the image processing algorithms.
Performance
The Cat S75 holds a clear advantage in raw processing power thanks to its Mediatek Dimensity 930 chipset. Featuring a Cortex-A78 core clocked at 2.2 GHz, it outperforms the BL7000’s Dimensity 6300 (2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores) in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the 6nm fabrication process is shared between both chipsets, suggesting similar thermal efficiency. The BL7000’s architecture, while slightly slower per core, may offer better sustained performance due to potentially less thermal throttling. The impact of RAM speed (LPDDR4x vs LPDDR5x, assumed) is also a factor, favoring the S75.
Battery Life
The Blackview BL7000 dominates in battery endurance with a reported 118:45h of usage. This is a significant advantage over what we would expect from the Cat S75, given its focus on performance and the inclusion of wireless charging, which inherently reduces efficiency. The BL7000 also offers 33W wired charging and 6W reverse wired charging, providing flexibility. The Cat S75 counters with 15W wireless charging, a convenience feature the BL7000 lacks. While the Cat S75’s battery capacity is unknown, the BL7000’s longevity is a major selling point.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview BL7000 if you need a phone that can genuinely last for days on a single charge, are frequently away from power outlets, or prioritize value for money. Buy the Cat S75 if you prefer a faster processor for gaming or demanding applications, value the convenience of wireless charging, and are willing to trade some battery life for increased performance.