Blackview BL5000 vs BV9200: The Ultimate Rugged Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The BV9200 edges out the BL5000 thanks to its significantly faster charging (66W wired, 30W wireless), brighter display, and more modern chipset. While the BL5000 offers a decent experience, the BV9200's upgrades make it the superior choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview BL5000 | Blackview BV9200 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA 800 / 1900 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 29 | 2022, December 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 164 x 80.4 x 12.8 mm (6.46 x 3.17 x 0.50 in) | 174.5 x 81.8 x 13.6 mm (6.87 x 3.22 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 273 g (9.63 oz) | 310 g (10.93 oz) |
| IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2300 pixels (~400 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.36 inches, 100.4 cm2 (~76.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~73.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 16 MP, 125˚ (ultrawide) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/1.8, 120˚, (ultrawide), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired | 66W wired 30W wireless |
| Type | 4980 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange, Green | Black, Orange, Green |
| Price | About 260 EUR | About 200 EUR |
Blackview BL5000
- Potentially better gaming performance
- More efficient chipset (7nm)
- Generally more affordable
- Slower charging
- Less bright display
- Older chipset
Blackview BV9200
- Faster 66W wired and 30W wireless charging
- Brighter display for outdoor use
- More modern chipset (Helio G96)
- Potentially higher price
- 12nm process less efficient than 7nm
Display Comparison
The BV9200 boasts a significantly brighter display (481 nits) compared to the BL5000, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. The BV9200 also advertises a 1423:1 contrast ratio, suggesting richer colors and deeper blacks. While both likely use similar LCD panel technology, the BV9200's improvements are noticeable.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are not fully available for both devices. Assuming similar sensor sizes, the BV9200's more modern chipset might offer slightly better image processing. Both phones likely feature multiple rear cameras (wide, macro, depth) for versatility. Expect decent, but not exceptional, camera performance from both.
Performance
The BL5000's Dimensity 700 chipset is generally more powerful than the BV9200's Helio G96. The Dimensity 700's 7nm process also contributes to better power efficiency. However, real-world performance differences might not be drastic for everyday use. Gaming performance will likely be better on the BL5000.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have large batteries (5000mAh or greater, typical for Blackview). However, the BV9200's 66W wired charging and 30W wireless charging provide a massive advantage, allowing for significantly faster top-ups compared to the BL5000's 30W wired charging.
Buying Guide
The Blackview BL5000 is a good option for budget-conscious users who prioritize a reliable and durable phone for basic tasks. The Blackview BV9200 is ideal for those needing faster charging, a brighter screen for outdoor visibility, and a more powerful processor for demanding applications and gaming.