Blackview Active 12 Pro vs. Ulefone Armor 17 Pro: A Rugged Performance Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Blackview Active 12 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7300 chipset offers a significant leap in processing power. However, the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro provides a compelling alternative for those valuing battery longevity and the convenience of wireless charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview Active 12 Pro | Ulefone Armor 17 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August | 2022, October 31 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August | Available. Released 2022, October 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 267.7 x 179 x 28.3 mm (10.54 x 7.05 x 1.11 in) | 172.7 x 80.4 x 12.5 mm (6.80 x 3.17 x 0.49 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 1522 g (3.36 lb) | 290 g (10.23 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.5m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 7 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~73.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~75.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 650 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 15, Doke OS_P 4.2 | Android 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF 20 MP, (night vision) | - |
| Features | LED flash | Triple-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52”, 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 8 MP, (night vision), 2 infrared night vision lights |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM Radio | Wireless FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | MagSafe compatible accessories | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired 10W reverse wired | 66W wired, 53% in 15 min 15W wireless Wireless reversed |
| Type | 30000 mAh | Li-Po 5380 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Black |
| Price | About 580 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 159:42h endurance, 800 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class G | - |
| Free fall | Class B (174 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Blackview Active 12 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7300)
- Ultra-fast 120W wired charging
- Long battery endurance (159:42h)
- No wireless charging
- Battery capacity not specified
Ulefone Armor 17 Pro
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless charging
- Efficient Helio G99 chipset
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficiency
- Slower processor (Helio G99)
- Slower wired charging (66W)
Display Comparison
The Blackview Active 12 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 677 nits, a respectable figure for outdoor visibility. While the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s display specs are not provided, rugged phones often prioritize durability over display quality. The Dimensity 7300’s integrated ISP likely supports a higher refresh rate panel, though this isn’t confirmed for the Active 12 Pro. The lack of information on the Armor 17 Pro’s panel technology makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Active 12 Pro’s brightness gives it an edge for use in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Neither device’s camera specs are provided beyond the chipsets. However, the Dimensity 7300’s superior image signal processor (ISP) suggests the Blackview Active 12 Pro will likely deliver better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The ISP handles noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image processing. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement, but the chipset advantage leans heavily towards the Blackview. We can assume both phones will include standard rugged phone features like enhanced image stabilization for action shots.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Blackview Active 12 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) is a significant upgrade over the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s Helio G99 (6nm). The Dimensity 7300’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.5 GHz, offer substantially higher single-core performance than the Armor 17 Pro’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. The 4nm process node further enhances efficiency and reduces thermal throttling under sustained load. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a better gaming experience for the Blackview. The Armor 17 Pro’s Helio G99 is still capable for everyday tasks, but will struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Blackview Active 12 Pro offers impressive 120W wired charging, a significant advantage over the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro’s 66W charging (53% in 15 minutes). While the Active 12 Pro’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the 120W charging suggests a focus on quick top-ups. The Ulefone Armor 17 Pro compensates with 15W wireless charging and wireless reverse charging, offering greater convenience. The Active 12 Pro’s endurance is rated at 159:42h, and the 800 charge cycles suggest a long-lasting battery. The Armor 17 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, but the Helio G99’s efficiency may allow for comparable real-world battery life despite the slower charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview Active 12 Pro if you need a rugged phone for demanding tasks like mobile gaming, video editing, or running resource-intensive applications. Its 120W charging is ideal for users who need to quickly top up their battery. Buy the Ulefone Armor 17 Pro if you prioritize extended battery life for multi-day trips, appreciate the flexibility of wireless charging, and don't require the absolute highest level of processing power.