Blackview Active 12 Pro vs Oukitel WP210: A Rugged Performance Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw processing power and future-proofing, the Oukitel WP210 takes the lead thanks to its Dimensity 8200 chipset. However, the Blackview Active 12 Pro offers a significantly faster charging experience and respectable endurance, making it ideal for those who value convenience and quick power-ups.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview Active 12 Pro | Oukitel WP210 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, August | 2025, July |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, August | Available. Released 2025, July 15 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 267.7 x 179 x 28.3 mm (10.54 x 7.05 x 1.11 in) | 163.6 x 77.9 x 13.7 mm (6.44 x 3.07 x 0.54 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 1522 g (3.36 lb) | 311 g (10.97 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 7 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~73.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.1 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 650 nits | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 15, Doke OS_P 4.2 | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM | 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF 20 MP, (night vision) | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.8", PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 1/2.76", PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.74" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM Radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 120W wired 10W reverse wired | 45W wired |
| Type | 30000 mAh | Li-Po 8800 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black | Gray, Black, Red |
| Price | About 580 EUR | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 159:42h endurance, 800 cycles | 86:17h endurance, 1000 cycles |
| Energy | Class G | Class B |
| Free fall | Class B (174 falls) | Class A (270 falls) |
| Repairability | Class B | Class C |
Blackview Active 12 Pro
- Ultra-fast 120W charging for minimal downtime
- High display brightness (677 nits) for outdoor visibility
- Respectable battery endurance (159:42h)
- Dimensity 7300 chipset is less powerful than the WP210’s
- Fewer battery cycles (800) compared to the WP210
Oukitel WP210
- More powerful Dimensity 8200 chipset for superior performance
- Longer battery life (86:17h endurance)
- Higher battery cycle count (1000) for longevity
- Slower 45W charging speed
- Display brightness not specified, potentially lower than Active 12 Pro
Display Comparison
The Blackview Active 12 Pro features a display capable of reaching 677 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility in direct sunlight – a crucial feature for a rugged device. While the WP210’s display specs are not provided, the Active 12 Pro’s brightness advantage is significant. Both devices likely utilize IPS LCD panels given their market segment, but the Active 12 Pro’s higher brightness is a clear win for outdoor usability. Color accuracy and resolution are assumed to be similar, focusing on practicality over premium features.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond sensor resolution, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the focus for both devices is likely on durability and practicality rather than photographic excellence. We can assume both will offer serviceable image quality in good lighting conditions. The absence of information regarding OIS or aperture sizes suggests neither prioritizes low-light photography. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is likely a marketing tactic, offering limited real-world benefit.
Performance
The Oukitel WP210’s Dimensity 8200 (4nm) chipset represents a clear step up in processing power compared to the Blackview Active 12 Pro’s Dimensity 7300 (4nm). The WP210’s CPU configuration – 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a more aggressive core cluster for peak performance. While both chips are built on a 4nm process for efficiency, the 8200’s architecture delivers superior multi-core and single-core performance. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience on the WP210. The Active 12 Pro’s 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores are still capable, but fall behind in raw speed.
Battery Life
The Oukitel WP210 boasts a battery endurance of 86:17 hours, while the Blackview Active 12 Pro achieves 159:42 hours. This significant difference is partially offset by the Active 12 Pro’s blazing-fast 120W wired charging, capable of replenishing the battery much quicker than the WP210’s 45W charging. The WP210’s 1000 battery cycles suggest greater long-term battery health, while the Active 12 Pro offers 800 cycles. The choice depends on user preference: prioritizing maximum uptime (WP210) or rapid charging (Active 12 Pro).
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview Active 12 Pro if you need the fastest possible charging speeds and a bright, easily viewable display for outdoor use. Its 120W charging is a game-changer for minimizing downtime. Buy the Oukitel WP210 if you prioritize sustained performance for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value a longer battery life between charges, even if it means slower replenishment.