Blackview Active 10 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9E: A Deep Dive into Rugged Performance
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Blackview Active 10 Pro is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 7300 chipset delivers a smoother experience for demanding tasks, and its 55W charging is a substantial upgrade over the Armor 9E’s 18W. While both are rugged, the Active 10 Pro offers a modern performance edge.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview Active 10 Pro | Ulefone Armor 9E |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat12 600/150 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 09 | 2020, September 08. Released 2020, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 09 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Front glass, aluminum back with rubber, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 267.6 x 179 x 19.5 mm (10.54 x 7.05 x 0.77 in) | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm (6.62 x 3.23 x 0.59 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 1214 g (2.68 lb) | 324 g (11.43 oz) |
| - | IP68/IP69K dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.2m MIL-STD-810G compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Scratch-resistant glass, oleophobic coating |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~207 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.95 inches, 347.7 cm2 (~72.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~70.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 360 nits | IPS LCD |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6779 Helio P90 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 14, Doke OS_P 4.0 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, (wide) 20 MP, (night vision) | - |
| Features | LED flash | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM Radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, coulombmeter |
| - | Endoscope mount (camera sold separately) | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 30000 mAh | Li-Po 6600 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Black |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 290 EUR |
| SAR | 1.34 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 166:39h endurance, 2000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class D | - |
| Free fall | Class A (208 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Blackview Active 10 Pro
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 7300)
- Faster 55W charging
- Longer battery endurance (166:39h)
- Potentially higher price
- Rugged design may add bulk
Ulefone Armor 9E
- Lower price point
- Rugged design for durability
- Acceptable performance for basic tasks
- Outdated Helio P90 chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Lower overall performance
Display Comparison
Display specifications are absent from the provided data, but considering the price points, we can infer both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The key differentiator will be resolution and brightness. The Armor 9E, being an older model, likely has lower peak brightness. The Active 10 Pro, benefiting from newer technology, may offer a more vibrant and visible display in direct sunlight. Bezels are also likely smaller on the Active 10 Pro, contributing to a more modern aesthetic.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but the chipset difference hints at superior image processing capabilities in the Active 10 Pro. The Dimensity 7300 includes a more advanced Image Signal Processor (ISP) than the Helio P90. While sensor size and lens aperture are unknown, the Active 10 Pro will likely produce sharper, more detailed images with better dynamic range and low-light performance. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and shouldn't be a deciding factor.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Blackview Active 10 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) is a modern, high-performance chipset featuring a Cortex-A78 prime core clocked at 2.5 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Ulefone Armor 9E’s Helio P90 (12nm), which relies on older Cortex-A75 cores at 2.2 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7300 translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management, meaning sustained performance will be higher. The Active 10 Pro will handle multitasking, gaming, and demanding applications with ease, while the Armor 9E will likely struggle with resource-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Blackview Active 10 Pro boasts an impressive 166:39h endurance rating and a 2000 cycle lifespan, suggesting excellent battery longevity. While the Armor 9E’s battery capacity is unknown, its 18W charging is significantly slower than the Active 10 Pro’s 55W charging. This means the Active 10 Pro can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. The longer endurance rating of the Active 10 Pro also indicates it can last longer on a single charge, even with moderate to heavy usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview Active 10 Pro if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding applications like gaming, video editing, or running multiple apps simultaneously. Its faster processor and charging will save you time and frustration. Buy the Ulefone Armor 9E if you prioritize a lower price point and only require basic smartphone functionality – calls, texts, and light app usage – and aren't concerned with future-proofing or demanding performance.