Blackview Active 10 Pro vs. Nokia XR20: A Rugged Smartphone Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the Blackview Active 10 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7300 chipset offers a significant leap over the Snapdragon 480 in the Nokia XR20. However, the Nokia XR20 remains a compelling option for those valuing long-term software support and a more refined user experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview Active 10 Pro | Nokia XR20 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 25, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 09 | 2021, July 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 09 | Available. Released 2021, August 04 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 267.6 x 179 x 19.5 mm (10.54 x 7.05 x 0.77 in) | 171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mm (6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 1214 g (2.68 lb) | 248 g (8.75 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 60 min) Drop-to-concrete resistance from up to 1.8m MIL-STD-810H compliant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5, Mohs level 5 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~207 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 10.95 inches, 347.7 cm2 (~72.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~76.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 360 nits | IPS LCD, 550 nits |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14, Doke OS_P 4.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 108 MP, (wide) 20 MP, (night vision) | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash | Zeiss optics, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, second LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 50 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0 (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM Radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 55W wired | 18W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 30000 mAh | Li-Po 4630 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Orange | Ultra Blue, Granite Gray |
| Models | - | TA-1368, TA-1362 |
| Price | About 330 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | 1.34 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 1.13 W/kg (head) 1.43 W/kg (body) |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 166:39h endurance, 2000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class D | - |
| Free fall | Class A (208 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
Blackview Active 10 Pro
- Significantly faster processor for demanding tasks
- Much faster 55W wired charging
- Longer battery life and 2000 charge cycles
- Software support may be less consistent than Nokia
- Brand recognition is lower than Nokia
Nokia XR20
- Guaranteed software updates from Nokia
- Cleaner Android experience
- Strong brand reputation for reliability
- Significantly slower processor
- Slower charging speeds (18W wired, 15W wireless)
- Likely shorter battery lifespan
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided, but given the market segment, both likely feature LCD panels. The Blackview Active 10 Pro’s chipset suggests potential for a higher refresh rate display, which the XR20 likely lacks. The XR20’s focus on durability may mean a thicker glass covering, potentially impacting clarity. Without specific data, it’s reasonable to assume the Active 10 Pro has a more modern display technology.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent, but the chipset difference hints at superior image processing capabilities in the Blackview Active 10 Pro. The Dimensity 7300 includes a more advanced ISP (Image Signal Processor) than the Snapdragon 480. While both phones likely feature a main camera, the Active 10 Pro’s processor will enable faster image capture, better low-light performance, and more sophisticated computational photography features. The absence of details prevents a deeper analysis, but the processing power advantage is clear.
Performance
The performance gap between these two is substantial. The Blackview Active 10 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4nm) is a significantly more powerful chipset than the Nokia XR20’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 (8nm). The Dimensity 7300’s Cortex-A78 cores, clocked at 2.5 GHz, provide a considerable advantage in CPU-intensive tasks compared to the XR20’s Kryo 460 cores at 2.0 GHz. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7300 also translates to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. This means the Active 10 Pro will handle gaming and multitasking far more smoothly.
Battery Life
The Blackview Active 10 Pro boasts an impressive 166:39h endurance rating, suggesting exceptional battery life. While the Nokia XR20’s battery capacity is unknown, the Active 10 Pro’s endurance, combined with its 55W wired charging, provides a significant advantage. The XR20 offers 18W wired and 15W wireless charging, which is slower and less convenient. The Active 10 Pro’s 2000 charge cycles also indicate a longer lifespan for the battery itself, reducing the need for replacement over time.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview Active 10 Pro if you need a rugged phone capable of handling demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and if minimizing charging downtime is crucial. Its 55W charging and powerful processor make it ideal for power users. Buy the Nokia XR20 if you prefer a phone with guaranteed software updates, a cleaner Android experience, and a more moderate performance profile suitable for everyday tasks and reliable durability.