Looking for a new smartphone but unsure which way to go? The Blackview A95 offers an affordable entry point, while the Samsung Galaxy A54 represents a more premium mid-range experience. This comparison dives deep into their features to help you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A54 is the clear winner overall, boasting a superior chipset, brighter display, and better camera. However, the Blackview A95 provides impressive value for its price, making it a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers seeking basic functionality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - EU | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 - EU | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 41, 66 - USA | 25, 41, 66, 71 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 22 | 2023, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February | Available. Released 2023, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.5 x 8.6 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) | 158.2 x 76.7 x 8.2 mm (6.23 x 3.02 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771V/CT Helio P70 (12 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G68 MP5 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 20 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
other unspecified cameras | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 4380 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Blue | Lime, Graphite, Violet, White |
| Models | - | SM-A546V, SM-A546U, SM-A546U1, SM-A546B, SM-A546B/DS, SM-A546E, SM-A546E/DS, SM-A5460, SM-A546M, SM-A546M/DS, SM-A546W |
| Price | About 190 EUR | € 210.00 / $ 119.11 / £ 169.95 / ₹ 28,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.69 W/kg (head) 1.34 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 506678 (v9)
GeekBench: 2703 (v5.1), 2797 (v6)
GFXBench: 25fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Blackview A95
- Extremely Affordable
- Decent Battery Life
- Large Display (likely)
- Lower Performance
- Less Capable Camera
- Basic Features
- Less Premium Build Quality
Samsung Galaxy A54
- Excellent Performance
- Superior Camera
- Bright and Vibrant Display
- Premium Build Quality
- Long Battery Life
- Higher Price
- Charging Speed Could Be Faster
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54's display is significantly better. Its 980 nits peak brightness and infinite contrast ratio provide a vibrant and easily viewable experience, even in direct sunlight. The Blackview A95 likely has a more standard display, lacking the same level of brightness and color accuracy. Resolution is likely similar, but the A54's panel technology is superior.
Camera Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A54's camera system is expected to be superior in both photo and video quality. Samsung's image processing is generally excellent, and the A54 likely features more advanced features and better low-light performance. The Blackview A95's camera is likely adequate for basic photography but won't match the A54's capabilities.
Performance
The Exynos 1380 in the Galaxy A54 is a substantial upgrade over the Helio P70 in the Blackview A95. The A54's 5nm process and Cortex-A78 cores offer significantly faster processing speeds and improved efficiency. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance on the A54.
Battery Life
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with the Galaxy A54 demonstrating impressive endurance ratings. While the Blackview A95's battery capacity might be comparable, the A54's more efficient chipset contributes to its longer battery life in real-world usage.
Buying Guide
The Blackview A95 is ideal for users on a tight budget who prioritize affordability over premium features. The Samsung Galaxy A54 is perfect for those seeking a well-rounded mid-range phone with a great display, capable camera, and reliable performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Blackview A95 a good phone for gaming?
The Blackview A95 can handle basic games, but its chipset isn't powerful enough for demanding titles. The Samsung Galaxy A54 offers a much better gaming experience.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Samsung is known for providing longer software update support than Blackview. Expect more timely Android updates and security patches on the Galaxy A54.
