Blackview A95 vs Samsung Galaxy A50: Which Budget Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A50 generally wins due to its established brand reputation, brighter display, and slightly better overall performance. However, the Blackview A95 offers competitive specs at a significantly lower price point, making it a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview A95 | Samsung Galaxy A50 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 - EU | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 - EU | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 41, 66 - USA | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 29, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71 - SM-A505U | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, January 22 | 2019, February 25. Released 2019, March 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, February | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.5 x 8.6 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) | 158.5 x 74.7 x 7.7 mm (6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 166 g (5.86 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 102.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 100.5 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771V/CT Helio P70 (12 nm) | Exynos 9610 (10 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, One UI 3.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 20 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF other unspecified cameras | 25 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 25 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| - | ANT+ Bixby natural language commands and dictation | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 4380 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Gold, Blue | Black, White, Blue, Coral |
| Models | - | SM-A505F, SM-A505FN, SM-A505GN, SM-A505G, SM-A505FM, SM-A505YN, SM-A505W, SM-A505X, SM-A505U, SM-A505GT, SM-A505U1, SM-A505G, SM-A505N, SM-S506DL |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.31 W/kg (head) 0.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.27 W/kg (head) 1.39 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing | ||
|---|---|---|
| 128GB 4GB RAM | - | $ 279.99 |
| 64GB 4GB RAM | - | $ 171.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -93.4dB / Crosstalk -92.3dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 98h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | Voice 68dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 82dB |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 144574 (v7) GeekBench: 5396 (v4.4) GFXBench: 8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Blackview A95
- Affordable price
- Decent performance for the price
- Large battery capacity
- Modern design
- Less established brand
- Potentially lower camera quality
- May lack software updates
- IPS display (less vibrant than AMOLED)
Samsung Galaxy A50
- Reputable brand
- Brighter display
- Slightly better performance
- Excellent battery life
- Super AMOLED display
- Higher price
- 15W charging (slower than some competitors)
- Older chipset
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A50 boasts a measured peak brightness of 551 nits, offering better visibility in sunlight compared to the Blackview A95. While the A50's contrast ratio is nominally infinite, real-world viewing experiences are subjective. Both phones feature Super AMOLED (A50) and IPS (A95) panels, respectively, offering vibrant colors and good viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Samsung Galaxy A50 likely has a slight advantage in image processing and overall quality. The A50's camera is known for its vibrant colors and decent low-light performance. The Blackview A95's camera is adequate for casual photography, but may struggle in challenging lighting conditions. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) would need to be compared for a more precise assessment.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A50's Exynos 9610 chipset, built on a 10nm process, generally provides smoother performance than the Blackview A95's Mediatek Helio P70 (12nm). While both have octa-core CPUs, the A50's slightly higher clock speeds and more efficient manufacturing process give it an edge in everyday tasks and gaming. However, both phones have 4GB of RAM, which may limit multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A50 shines in this category, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 98 hours. While the Blackview A95's battery capacity is likely comparable, the A50's power efficiency gives it a significant advantage in terms of longevity. Both phones support 18W/15W wired charging, respectively, but charging speeds are generally similar.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Blackview A95? Users prioritizing affordability and a decent feature set without breaking the bank. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A50? Those seeking a reliable brand, a brighter display, and a more polished user experience, even if it means spending a bit more.