The Blackview A53 and Doogee X95 Pro represent the extreme end of the smartphone price spectrum. Both devices target users prioritizing absolute affordability, but subtle differences in their specifications can impact real-world performance. This comparison dissects those differences to determine which phone delivers the best value for the money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user seeking a functional, ultra-budget smartphone, the Blackview A53 edges out the Doogee X95 Pro. While both share the same Helio A22 chipset, the A53’s slightly higher CPU clock speed, though minimal, provides a marginal performance advantage in everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - USA | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 - International | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 41, 66 - USA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 03 | 2021, January 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March | Available. Released 2021, January |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) | 167 x 77.4 x 8.9 mm (6.57 x 3.05 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 540 x 1200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~202 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~79.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 600 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6761V/WE Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8300 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke OS 3.0 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.0 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Triple | 12 MP
other unspecified camera | 13 MP, (wide)
2 MP, (telephoto)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 720p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5080 mAh | 4350 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Rock Grey, Murky Black, Starry Blue | Black, Blue, Green |
| Price | - | About 120 EUR |
Blackview A53
- Slightly faster CPU clock speed (2.0 GHz)
- Potentially better value for money
- Suitable for basic smartphone tasks
- Limited performance for demanding applications
- Likely basic camera quality
- Display specifications are unknown
Doogee X95 Pro
- Potentially more durable build quality (Doogee reputation)
- Reliable performance for essential functions
- Affordable price point
- Slower CPU clock speed (1.8 GHz)
- Likely basic camera quality
- Display specifications are unknown
Display Comparison
Neither Blackview nor Doogee provide detailed display specifications beyond the panel type. Given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of information regarding brightness nits, resolution, or color gamut suggests a focus on cost reduction over display quality. Expect basic viewing experiences suitable for indoor use, but limited visibility in direct sunlight. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, maximizing screen real estate within a compact form factor.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are likely to be similar and of limited quality on both devices. The focus is on providing basic functionality rather than photographic excellence. Expect a primary camera sensor, potentially accompanied by a depth sensor or a low-resolution macro lens. Image processing will be minimal, resulting in images with limited dynamic range and detail, particularly in low-light conditions. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) will exacerbate camera shake. The 2MP macro cameras often found in this segment are unlikely to deliver usable results.
Performance
Both the Blackview A53 and Doogee X95 Pro are powered by the Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) chipset, featuring a quad-core Cortex-A53 CPU. However, the A53 boasts a clock speed of 2.0 GHz, while the X95 Pro is clocked at 1.8 GHz. This 200 MHz difference, while seemingly small, can translate to slightly faster app loading times and smoother multitasking on the A53. Both devices will struggle with demanding games or resource-intensive applications. RAM configurations are not specified, but are likely limited to 2GB or 3GB, further restricting multitasking capabilities. Thermal management is unlikely to be a concern given the low-power nature of the Helio A22.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 10W wired charging, indicating similar charging speeds. Battery capacity is not specified, but is likely in the 3000-4000 mAh range. Given the low-power chipset and basic display, both phones should be able to provide a full day of battery life with moderate usage. Expect approximately 2-3 hours of screen-on time. The 10W charging will result in relatively slow charging times, requiring several hours to reach a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview A53 if you need a reliably basic smartphone for essential tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and prioritize the smallest possible performance edge within this price bracket. Buy the Doogee X95 Pro if you prefer a potentially more robust build quality (based on Doogee’s brand reputation) and are willing to accept a very slight performance compromise. Both are suitable for first-time smartphone users or as emergency backup devices.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will either of these phones run popular games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While technically possible to launch, neither the Blackview A53 nor the Doogee X95 Pro are suitable for playing demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty. The Helio A22 chipset and limited RAM will result in extremely low frame rates, significant lag, and a generally unplayable experience. These phones are best suited for casual gaming or simpler titles.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge either phone from 0%?
With 10W wired charging, expect a full charge to take approximately 3-4 hours. The low charging wattage prioritizes battery health over speed. It's recommended to charge overnight for convenience.
❓ Are these phones good for elderly users who primarily need calling and texting?
Yes, both the Blackview A53 and Doogee X95 Pro are excellent choices for elderly users who primarily need calling and texting. Their simplicity, affordability, and sufficient battery life make them ideal for basic communication needs. The large icons and straightforward interface are also user-friendly.
