Blackview is making waves in the budget smartphone market, offering compelling devices at affordable prices. The A53 and Oscal C70 are two popular contenders, but which one delivers the best value? This detailed comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Blackview Oscal C70 is the clear winner. Its Octa-core processor significantly outperforms the A53's Quad-core, resulting in smoother performance and better multitasking. While both are budget phones, the C70 offers a noticeable upgrade in speed and overall usability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - USA | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 - International | 1, 3, 7, 8, 19, 20, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 41, 66 - USA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 03 | 2023, April 20 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) | 163.2 x 75.2 x 8.8 mm (6.43 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.9 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke OS 3.0 | Android 12, Doke-OS 3.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 3GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.0 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
0.3 MP, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Triple | 12 MP
other unspecified camera | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Fingerprint (side-mounted), unspecified sensors |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | 5080 mAh | Li-Ion 5180 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Rock Grey, Murky Black, Starry Blue | Dim Forest Green, Summer Sky Blue, Stardust Grey |
| Price | - | About 80 EUR |
Blackview A53
- Extremely affordable
- Decent battery life
- Basic functionality
- Slow performance
- Limited multitasking
- Outdated chipset
- Slow charging
Blackview Oscal C70
- Significantly faster performance
- Better multitasking
- More responsive UI
- Modern chipset
- Still a budget phone (compromises expected)
- Slow charging
- Camera quality is average
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolution (likely HD+). The Oscal C70 *might* have a slightly larger display, but this is not confirmed. Expect adequate viewing angles and color reproduction for the price point, but don't expect flagship-level quality.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are often similar in this price range. Both phones likely feature a primary rear camera around 13MP, potentially with a secondary depth sensor. Image quality will be decent in good lighting conditions, but expect noise and limited detail in low light. The Oscal C70's more powerful processor *could* lead to slightly better image processing.
Performance
This is where the Oscal C70 shines. The Unisoc T606's Octa-core architecture, with two powerful Cortex-A75 cores, provides a substantial performance boost over the A53's Quad-core Helio A22. Expect faster app loading times, smoother scrolling, and better handling of demanding tasks on the C70. The A53 will likely struggle with multitasking and more graphically intensive apps.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a battery capacity around 5000mAh. Battery life should be comparable, offering a full day of moderate use. The 10W wired charging on both is relatively slow, so be prepared for longer charging times.
Buying Guide
The Blackview A53 is a good option for users on an extremely tight budget who primarily need a phone for basic calling, texting, and light social media use. The Oscal C70 is ideal for those who want a more responsive experience, occasional gaming, and a generally smoother user interface, without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Blackview A53 good for gaming?
No, the A53's chipset is not powerful enough for demanding games. It can handle very basic games, but expect low frame rates and lag.
❓ How much RAM do these phones have?
Typically, these models come with 3GB or 4GB of RAM. The Oscal C70's more powerful processor will make better use of the RAM.
❓ What storage options are available?
Both phones usually offer 32GB or 64GB of internal storage, expandable via microSD card.
❓ Which phone has better software support?
Blackview's software support is generally limited. Expect infrequent updates, if any. Neither phone is likely to receive major Android version upgrades.
