Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Blackview A53 and A52 are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best value for your money? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Blackview A53 edges out the A52 thanks to its more efficient chipset and slightly better performance. While both are budget devices, the A53's Helio A22 provides a smoother experience, making it the preferable choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - USA | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 - International | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 41, 66 - USA | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 03 | 2022, November 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March | Available. Released 2022, November 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) | 164.2 x 62 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.44 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 183.6 g (6.49 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~100.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8322 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke OS 3.0 | Android 12, Doke OS G0 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.0 | eMMC |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP
other unspecified camera |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Triple | 12 MP
other unspecified camera | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | 5080 mAh | 5180 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Rock Grey, Murky Black, Starry Blue | Polar Night, Vitality Green, Ice Blue |
| Price | - | About 100 EUR |
Blackview A53
- More efficient chipset
- Potentially better performance
- Slightly better battery life
- Modern manufacturing process (12nm)
- May be slightly more expensive than the A52
- Charging speed is slow (10W)
Blackview A52
- Lower price point
- Octa-core CPU (though less efficient)
- Decent battery life
- Less efficient chipset
- Potentially slower performance
- Older manufacturing process (22nm)
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolution (likely HD+). Expect comparable viewing experiences, though the A53's slightly newer chipset *might* allow for marginally better color accuracy and brightness, but this is speculative without specific display specs.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar on both devices, probably featuring a 13MP main camera and a basic front-facing camera. Image quality will largely depend on software optimization. Given the A53's newer chipset, it *might* have slightly better image processing capabilities, but don't expect a dramatic difference.
Performance
The A53's Mediatek Helio A22 (12nm) is significantly more efficient than the A52's Unisoc SC9863A1 (22nm). While the A52 boasts an octa-core CPU, the A53's quad-core with a higher clock speed and more modern manufacturing process generally translates to better real-world performance and less thermal throttling. Expect smoother multitasking and app loading on the A53.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a battery capacity around 4000-5000mAh. The A53's more efficient chipset should result in slightly better battery life, allowing it to last a bit longer on a single charge.
Buying Guide
The Blackview A53 is ideal for users prioritizing a bit more performance and efficiency in a budget phone. The Blackview A52 is a good option for those seeking the absolute lowest price point and are willing to compromise slightly on speed and overall responsiveness.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the chipsets in the Blackview A53 and A52?
The Blackview A53 uses a Mediatek Helio A22 (12nm), which is more efficient than the Unisoc SC9863A1 (22nm) in the A52. This generally leads to better performance and battery life.
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Blackview A53 is likely the better choice for gaming due to its more efficient chipset and potentially smoother performance. However, neither phone is a gaming powerhouse.
