Looking for a budget-friendly smartphone that doesn't completely compromise on features? The Blackview A53 Pro and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ are both contenders, but they cater to different needs. This comprehensive comparison will break down their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ is the clear winner, boasting significantly superior performance, a faster charging speed, and a more advanced camera system. While the Blackview A53 Pro offers affordability, the Redmi Note 11T Pro+ delivers a much better overall experience for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - USA | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 - International | 1, 3, 5, 8, 19, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 41, 66 - USA | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, March 03 | 2022, May 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, March | Available. Released 2022, May 31 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) | 163.6 x 74.3 x 8.9 mm (6.44 x 2.93 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 194.6 g (6.88 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~407 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 144Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 650 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.85 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G35 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8100 (5 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G610 MC6 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke OS 3.0 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 12 MP
other unspecified camera | 64 MP, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide)
2 MP, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass, color spectrum |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 10 min, 100% in 19 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5080 mAh | Li-Po 4400 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Rock Grey, Murky Black, Starry Blue | Blue, Silver, Black |
| Models | - | 22041216UC |
| Price | - | About 300 EUR |
Blackview A53 Pro
- Affordable
- Large Display
- Decent Battery Life (considering charging speed)
- Weak Performance
- Basic Camera
- Slow Charging
- Outdated Chipset
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+
- Excellent Performance
- Fast Charging (120W)
- Good Camera
- High Refresh Rate Display
- Modern Chipset
- Slightly More Expensive
- Potential Software Bloat (Xiaomi UI)
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11T Pro+ likely features a higher resolution AMOLED display with a faster refresh rate (likely 120Hz or 144Hz) compared to the A53 Pro's likely LCD panel. Expect better color accuracy, contrast, and smoother scrolling on the Redmi.
Camera Comparison
The Redmi Note 11T Pro+ likely has a higher resolution main camera and potentially OIS (Optical Image Stabilization), resulting in better image quality, especially in low light. The A53 Pro's camera is likely adequate for casual snapshots but won't compete with the Redmi's capabilities.
Performance
The Dimensity 8100 in the Redmi Note 11T Pro+ is a powerhouse compared to the Helio G35. Expect significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Redmi. The A53 Pro will handle basic tasks adequately, but struggles with demanding applications.
Battery Life
While both phones likely have similar battery capacities (around 5000mAh), the Redmi Note 11T Pro+'s 120W charging is a game-changer. It can charge from 0 to 50% in just 10 minutes and 100% in under 20 minutes, a massive advantage over the A53 Pro's 10W charging.
Buying Guide
The Blackview A53 Pro is ideal for users on a very tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and a large screen. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11T Pro+ is perfect for those seeking a balance of performance, camera quality, and fast charging without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Blackview A53 Pro worth buying?
It's a viable option if you're on an extremely tight budget and only need basic smartphone functionality. However, consider stretching your budget for the Redmi Note 11T Pro+ for a significantly better experience.
❓ How much faster is the Redmi Note 11T Pro+'s charging?
The Redmi Note 11T Pro+ charges at 120W, while the A53 Pro charges at 10W. This means the Redmi can charge to 50% in around 10 minutes and 100% in under 20 minutes, compared to potentially over 2 hours for the A53 Pro.
