Blackview A53 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A13: The Ultimate Budget Battle

Looking for an affordable smartphone that doesn't completely break the bank? The Blackview A53 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A13 are both contenders in the budget phone arena. But which one offers the best bang for your buck? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A13 takes the crown. While the Blackview A53 Pro is a budget option, the A13's superior display, more efficient chipset, and established brand reputation make it the more compelling choice for most users, despite a slightly higher price.

PHONES
Phone Names Blackview A53 Pro Samsung Galaxy A13
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 - USAHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 40 - International1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 25, 26, 28, 41, 66 - USA-
Launch
Announced2023, March 032022, March 04
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, MarchAvailable. Released 2022, March 23
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame, plastic backGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions164.6 x 76.9 x 9.4 mm (6.48 x 3.03 x 0.37 in)165.1 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.5 x 3.01 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight194.6 g (6.88 oz)195 g (6.88 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density)
Size6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.6% screen-to-body ratio)6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDPLS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek MT6765 Helio G35 (12 nm)Exynos 850 (8 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G52
OSAndroid 12, Doke OS 3.0Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6.1
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal64GB 4GB RAM32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM
 eMMC 5.0eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flashLED flash, panorama, HDR
Quad-50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Single8 MP8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
Triple12 MP other unspecified camera-
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Single8 MP8 MP, f/2.2, (wide)
VideoYes1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/acWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsUnspecifiedFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, compass
 -Virtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging10W wired15W wired
Type5080 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsRock Grey, Murky Black, Starry BlueBlack, White, Peach, Blue
Models-SM-A135F, SM-A135F/DS, SM-A135M, SM-A135U, SM-A135U1, SM-A135N
Price-€ 94.99 / $ 129.99 / £ 89.00
SAR-0.49 W/kg (head)
SAR EU-0.37 W/kg (head)     1.39 W/kg (body)
Tests
Battery life- Endurance rating 114h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1324:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker- -29.7 LUFS (Average)
Performance- AnTuTu: 122822 (v8), 136286 (v9) GeekBench: 588 (v5.1) GFXBench: 5.2fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Blackview A53 Pro

  • Very affordable
  • Decent battery life

  • Lower performance
  • Less polished software
  • Likely inferior display
  • Uncertain camera quality

Samsung Galaxy A13

  • Brighter and better display
  • More efficient chipset
  • Better camera performance
  • Reputable brand
  • Good battery life

  • Slightly more expensive
  • Still a budget phone with limitations

Display Comparison

The Samsung Galaxy A13 boasts a significantly brighter display (587 nits vs. likely lower on the A53 Pro) and a generally better color accuracy. While both offer a 1324:1 contrast ratio, the A13's higher brightness makes it more usable outdoors. The A53 Pro's display is adequate, but noticeably less impressive.

Camera Comparison

While both phones are budget-oriented, the Galaxy A13 generally offers better image quality thanks to Samsung's image processing and potentially better sensors. The A53 Pro's camera is functional, but lacks the refinement of the A13. Specific camera specs are missing for the A53 Pro, making a direct comparison difficult, but the A13 is expected to perform better.

Performance

The Exynos 850 in the Galaxy A13, built on an 8nm process, is more efficient and generally faster than the Helio G35 (12nm) in the A53 Pro. Expect smoother multitasking and app loading on the A13. The A53 Pro's performance is acceptable for basic tasks, but struggles with more demanding applications.

Battery Life

Both phones boast impressive endurance ratings (114h), suggesting excellent battery life. However, the A13's more efficient chipset likely contributes to slightly better real-world battery performance, even with a similar capacity.

Buying Guide

Who should buy the Blackview A53 Pro? Users prioritizing the absolute lowest price and are comfortable with a less polished experience. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A13? Anyone seeking a reliable, well-rounded budget phone with a good display, decent performance, and the backing of a reputable brand.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is the Blackview A53 Pro worth buying?
It's a very budget-friendly option, but the Samsung Galaxy A13 offers a better overall experience for a slightly higher price.
❓ Which phone has better performance?
The Samsung Galaxy A13's Exynos 850 chipset provides noticeably better performance than the Blackview A53 Pro's Helio G35.
❓ What is the battery life like on both phones?
Both phones offer excellent battery life, with endurance ratings around 114 hours. The A13's efficiency likely gives it a slight edge in real-world usage.