Blackview A52 vs. Google Pixel 6a: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Google Pixel 6a is the clear winner, offering significantly superior performance, camera quality, and software experience. While the Blackview A52 provides incredible value for its price, the Pixel 6a's overall package justifies its higher cost for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview A52 | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 22 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, November 25 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 62 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.44 x 0.36 in) | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 183.6 g (6.49 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~100.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A1 (22 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8322 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 12, Doke OS G0 3.0 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| eMMC | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 13 MP other unspecified camera | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Unspecified | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | 5180 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Polar Night, Vitality Green, Ice Blue | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | - | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | About 100 EUR | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
Blackview A52
- Extremely affordable
- Long battery life
- Decent for basic tasks
- Low performance
- Basic camera
- Lower quality display
- Slow charging
Google Pixel 6a
- Excellent camera
- Smooth performance
- Bright and vibrant display
- Timely software updates
- Fast charging
- Higher price
- No expandable storage
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a significantly brighter display (876 nits) with an infinite contrast ratio, providing vibrant colors and excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. The Blackview A52's display is likely less bright and may have lower contrast, resulting in a less immersive viewing experience. Pixel 6a wins.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a's camera is a major selling point, leveraging Google's computational photography expertise to deliver stunning images. The Blackview A52's camera is likely to be adequate for basic snapshots but won't match the Pixel 6a's dynamic range, detail, and low-light performance. Pixel 6a wins.
Performance
The Google Pixel 6a's Google Tensor chip (5nm) is a powerhouse compared to the Blackview A52's Unisoc SC9863A1 (22nm). Expect noticeably faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Pixel 6a. The Tensor chip's AI capabilities also enhance features like photography. Pixel 6a wins.
Battery Life
Both phones offer impressive battery life with an endurance rating of 94h. However, the Pixel 6a supports 18W wired charging and PD3.0, offering faster charging speeds than the Blackview A52, which likely has slower charging capabilities.
Buying Guide
The Blackview A52 is ideal for users on a very tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and long battery life over premium features. The Google Pixel 6a is perfect for those seeking a reliable, well-rounded smartphone with excellent camera capabilities, smooth performance, and timely software updates.