Blackview A52 Pro vs Ulefone Note 13P: A Detailed Comparison for Budget Buyers

The Blackview A52 Pro and Ulefone Note 13P represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential functionality at an incredibly low price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The A52 Pro leverages the Unisoc T606, while the Note 13P opts for the MediaTek Helio G35. This comparison dives deep into the architectural differences and real-world implications of these chipsets, alongside other key features, to determine which device offers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and a slightly more modern architecture, the Blackview A52 Pro emerges as the better choice. While the Ulefone Note 13P offers a marginally lower price, the Unisoc T606’s Cortex-A75 cores provide a noticeable performance edge in everyday tasks and light multitasking.

PHONES
Phone Names Blackview A52 Pro Ulefone Note 13P
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 7, 8, 201, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2023, February2021, November 24
StatusAvailable. Released 2023, FebruaryAvailable. Released 2021, November 24
Body
Dimensions164.2 x 62 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.44 x 0.36 in)162.3 x 75.7 x 9.9 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.39 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight183.6 g (6.49 oz)198.5 g (7.02 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density)
Size6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~100.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
ChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MP1PowerVR GE8320
OSAndroid 13, Doke OS 4.0Android 11
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM
 -eMMC 5.1
Main Camera
Dual13 MP other unspecified camera20 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.78, 1.0µm, AF 2 MP (macro)
FeaturesLED flashLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single-16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.09, 1.0µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features-HDR
Single5 MP16 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.09, 1.0µm
VideoYes1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.2, A2DP5.0, A2DP, LE
NFCNoYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEOGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioUnspecifiedStereo FM radio, RDS, recording
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/nWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging-10W wired
Type5180 mAhLi-Po 5180 mAh
Misc
ColorsPolar Night, Vitality Green, Ice BlueStarry Black, Mystery Blue
PriceAbout 100 EURAbout 130 EUR

Blackview A52 Pro

  • More responsive performance due to Cortex-A75 cores
  • Potentially better thermal management with the Unisoc T606
  • More modern chipset architecture

  • Charging speed is likely slow (unspecified)
  • Camera quality is likely average for the price range

Ulefone Note 13P

  • Potentially lower price point
  • Acceptable for basic smartphone tasks
  • Decent battery life (estimated)

  • Older and less efficient Cortex-A53 cores
  • Slow 10W charging
  • Limited performance for multitasking or demanding apps

Display Comparison

Neither Blackview nor Ulefone provide detailed display specifications. Assuming typical panels for this price bracket, both likely utilize IPS LCDs with 720p+ resolutions. The lack of information prevents a direct comparison of brightness or color accuracy. However, the absence of high refresh rate support on either device suggests a focus on power efficiency rather than visual fluidity. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within a budget-friendly design.

Camera Comparison

Detailed camera specifications are unavailable. Given the price point, both devices likely feature a primary sensor around 8-13MP, supplemented by lower-resolution auxiliary lenses (often 2MP macro or depth sensors). These auxiliary sensors are generally of limited utility. Image processing will be basic on both, relying heavily on software algorithms to enhance detail and reduce noise. Expect acceptable results in well-lit conditions, but significant degradation in low-light scenarios. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner; however, a larger primary sensor (if present on either device) would be the most impactful factor.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Blackview A52 Pro’s Unisoc T606 features two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz, paired with six Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture provides a significant advantage in single-core performance compared to the Ulefone Note 13P’s MediaTek Helio G35. The G35 utilizes four Cortex-A53 cores at 2.3 GHz and another four at 1.8 GHz. While the G35’s higher clock speed *appears* advantageous, the older Cortex-A53 architecture is less efficient and delivers lower Instructions Per Clock (IPC) than the A75. This translates to the A52 Pro feeling more responsive in app launches and general navigation. The Unisoc T606 also benefits from a more modern process node (12nm) which can contribute to better thermal management, though both are 12nm.

Battery Life

Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, given the focus on affordability, both likely house batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range. The Ulefone Note 13P is limited to 10W wired charging, suggesting a longer charge time (likely 3-4 hours for a full charge). The Blackview A52 Pro’s charging speed is unspecified, but it’s reasonable to assume it’s also 10W, or potentially slightly higher. The Unisoc T606’s efficiency advantage *could* translate to slightly longer battery life in real-world usage, offsetting any potential capacity differences.

Buying Guide

Buy the Blackview A52 Pro if you need a phone that feels snappier for daily use, handles multiple apps without significant lag, and offers a more future-proof chipset architecture. Buy the Ulefone Note 13P if your primary concern is absolute minimum cost and you only require basic functionality like calls, texts, and light social media browsing, and are willing to accept slower performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Ulefone Note 13P struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
The Helio G35 in the Ulefone Note 13P is a basic chipset. While it can run apps like Facebook and WhatsApp, you may experience noticeable lag when switching between them or when the apps are performing complex tasks like loading videos. It's best suited for light usage.
❓ Is the Unisoc T606 in the Blackview A52 Pro capable of playing mobile games?
The Unisoc T606 can handle some mobile games, but don't expect high frame rates or graphics settings. It's suitable for less demanding titles or older games. More graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile will likely require significant settings adjustments to achieve playable performance.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Ulefone Note 13P with its 10W charging?
With its 10W charging, the Ulefone Note 13P will likely take between 3 to 4 hours to fully charge from 0% to 100%. This is a relatively slow charging speed compared to modern smartphones.