Blackview caters to a niche: durable, affordable smartphones. The A52 Pro represents a recent, budget-focused entry, while the BV9800 Pro is an older, more feature-rich model. This comparison dissects their core differences, focusing on how the chipset choices impact daily use and long-term performance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Blackview BV9800 Pro offers a more compelling package. Its Helio P70 chipset, while older, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the A52 Pro’s Unisoc T606, making it better suited for multitasking and demanding applications. The 18W charging is also a plus.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February | 2019, October 28. Released 2019, November |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 62 x 9.1 mm (6.46 x 2.44 x 0.36 in) | 168.5 x 81 x 14.8 mm (6.63 x 3.19 x 0.58 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 183.6 g (6.49 oz) | 322 g (11.36 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~100.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 97.4 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6771V/CT Helio P70 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| OS | Android 13, Doke OS 4.0 | Android 9.0 (Pie) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP
other unspecified camera | - |
| Features | LED flash | Thermal imaging, LED flash |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, thermal assisted camera
FLIR thermal camera (Lepton module) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP | 4.1, A2DP |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | 5180 mAh | 6580 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Polar Night, Vitality Green, Ice Blue | Black, Orange |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 340 EUR |
Blackview A52 Pro
- Most affordable option
- Rugged build quality
- Acceptable for basic tasks
- Underpowered Unisoc T606 chipset
- Slow charging (likely)
- Limited multitasking capabilities
Blackview BV9800 Pro
- More powerful Helio P70 chipset
- Faster 18W charging
- Better performance for demanding apps
- Higher price point
- Older chipset architecture
- May have shorter software support lifespan
Display Comparison
Neither Blackview provides detailed display specifications. However, given their market segment, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The key difference lies in the processing power driving them. The BV9800 Pro’s Helio P70 has a more powerful GPU, potentially enabling smoother animations and slightly better graphics rendering, even if the resolution and panel quality are similar. Expect both to struggle in direct sunlight without maximum brightness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the image signal processor (ISP) within the Helio P70 offers more advanced processing capabilities. This means the BV9800 Pro is likely to produce more detailed and dynamic photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The A52 Pro’s ISP will be more limited, resulting in softer images and less effective noise reduction. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both is largely a marketing gimmick and shouldn’t be a deciding factor.
Performance
The core battleground is the chipset. The Helio P70 in the BV9800 Pro, with its 4x Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.1 GHz, demonstrably outperforms the A52 Pro’s Unisoc T606. The A73 architecture is significantly more efficient and powerful than the A75 cores in the T606 (2x1.6 GHz). While both are 12nm chips, the P70’s core configuration translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience. The A52 Pro will handle basic tasks, but the BV9800 Pro offers headroom for more demanding applications. The BV9800 Pro’s GPU is also superior, further widening the performance gap.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, but rugged phones typically prioritize long battery life. The BV9800 Pro gains a significant advantage with its 18W wired charging. This will drastically reduce charging times compared to the A52 Pro, which likely supports a slower charging standard. Even if the A52 Pro has a slightly larger battery, the faster charging of the BV9800 Pro makes it more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Blackview A52 Pro if you prioritize extreme affordability and basic smartphone functionality – it’s ideal for users needing a secondary device or a very budget-conscious primary phone. Buy the Blackview BV9800 Pro if you value smoother performance, faster charging, and are willing to spend a bit more for a more capable rugged device, especially if you plan on using it for more than just calls and texts.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P70 in the BV9800 Pro struggle with modern games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Helio P70 isn't a flagship chipset, it's capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with acceptable frame rates. Expect some occasional stuttering, but it's a far better gaming experience than the A52 Pro’s Unisoc T606, which would likely require the lowest settings and still struggle.
❓ Is the ruggedness of the BV9800 Pro worth the extra cost over the A52 Pro?
If you work in a demanding environment or are prone to dropping your phone, the BV9800 Pro’s enhanced durability is a significant benefit. The extra cost is justified if you prioritize protection against drops, dust, and water ingress. The A52 Pro offers basic ruggedness, but the BV9800 Pro is built to withstand more abuse.
❓ How does the Unisoc T606 perform with everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
The Unisoc T606 is adequate for basic tasks like web browsing, social media, and light email use. However, you may experience noticeable lag when switching between apps or loading complex web pages. It's best suited for users with minimal smartphone demands.
❓ Does the BV9800 Pro support NFC for contactless payments?
Based on Blackview’s typical feature set for this price range, it's unlikely the BV9800 Pro includes NFC. Check the official product listing to confirm, but don't expect this functionality.
