Blackview A100 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G: The Ultimate Budget Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G emerges as the winner, offering a brighter display, faster charging, and a more efficient chipset. While the Blackview A100 is a decent option, the Redmi Note 12 4G provides a more polished and feature-rich experience for a similar price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Blackview A100 | Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 21 | 2023, March 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June | Available. Released 2023, March 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.3 x 77.6 x 8.8 mm (6.55 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) | 165.7 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 183.5 g (6.49 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~83.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ), 700 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.1 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6771T Helio P70 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 12 MP, f/1.8, (wide), dual pixel PDAF 8 MP, (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 4680 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gray, Blue, Green, Pink | Onyx Gray, Mint Green, Ice Blue |
| Models | - | 23021RAAEG, 23021RAA2Y, 23027RAD4I, 23028RA60L |
| Price | About 180 EUR | £ 189.99 / € 107.98 / ₹ 9,998 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.89 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.90 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 117h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.9 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 319219 (v9) GeekBench: 1797 (v5.1), 1341 (v6) GFXBench: 7.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Blackview A100
- Potentially larger battery capacity
- Rugged design (likely)
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Lower display brightness
- Less efficient chipset
- Slower charging
- Unspecified camera details
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- More efficient and faster chipset
- Faster 33W charging
- Likely better camera performance
- Potentially smaller battery capacity (though endurance is similar)
- Less rugged design
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 4G boasts a significantly brighter display at 744 nits (measured) compared to the A100's likely lower brightness. While the Redmi Note 12 4G advertises an 'infinite' contrast ratio (a nominal value), the overall viewing experience is noticeably better due to the higher brightness and color accuracy. The A100's display is adequate but lacks the vibrancy and clarity of the Redmi Note 12 4G.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer Photo/Video capabilities, the Redmi Note 12 4G is expected to have a better camera system due to Xiaomi's generally stronger camera optimization. The A100's camera is likely adequate for basic photography, but the Redmi Note 12 4G should deliver more detailed and vibrant images, especially in good lighting conditions. Specific camera specs are missing for the A100, making a direct comparison difficult.
Performance
The Snapdragon 685 in the Redmi Note 12 4G, built on a 6nm process, offers superior efficiency and performance compared to the A100's Helio P70 (12nm). The Snapdragon 685's CPU clocks are also slightly higher, contributing to smoother multitasking and app loading. While both have octa-core processors, the Snapdragon 685 provides a more responsive user experience.
Battery Life
Both phones claim impressive endurance ratings (117h). However, the Redmi Note 12 4G's more efficient chipset likely contributes to better real-world battery life despite the A100's potentially larger battery capacity. The Redmi Note 12 4G also supports faster 33W wired charging compared to the A100's 18W, significantly reducing charging times.
Buying Guide
The Blackview A100 is a good choice for users prioritizing a rugged design and a slightly larger battery capacity, but who aren't overly concerned with performance or camera quality. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 4G is ideal for those seeking a well-rounded experience with a vibrant display, reliable performance, and faster charging, making it a better all-around choice.