BlackBerry Q10 vs. Bold Touch 9900: A Classic Clash

The BlackBerry era evokes nostalgia for physical keyboards and secure communication. Two titans of that time, the Q10 and Bold 9900, offer distinct experiences. This review pits them against each other to determine which device holds up best today.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The BlackBerry Q10 edges out the Bold 9900 thanks to its superior battery life and slightly more modern chipset. While the Bold 9900 boasts a sleek design, the Q10's longevity and LTE option (in some versions) give it a slight advantage for those seeking a functional classic.

PHONES
Phone Names BlackBerry Q10 BlackBerry Bold Touch 9900
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all versionsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 - SQN100-1HSDPA 850 / 1900 / 2100 / 800
4G bands2, 4, 5, 17 - SQN100-1, SQN100-5-
SpeedEV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps, HSPA, LTE (market dependent)HSPA 14.4/5.76 Mbps
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA
 25 - SQN100-4HSDPA 900 / 1700 / 2100
Launch
Announced2013, January. Released 2013, April2011, May. Released 2011, August
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic back, plastic frame-
Dimensions119.6 x 66.8 x 10.4 mm (4.71 x 2.63 x 0.41 in)115 x 66 x 10.5 mm (4.53 x 2.60 x 0.41 in)
KeyboardQWERTYQWERTY
SIMMicro-SIMMini-SIM
Weight139 g (4.90 oz)130 g (4.59 oz)
Display
Resolution720 x 720 pixels, 1:1 ratio (~328 ppi density)640 x 480 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~286 ppi density)
Size3.1 inches, 31.0 cm2 (~38.8% screen-to-body ratio)2.8 inches, 24.3 cm2 (~32.0% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper AMOLEDTFT
Platform
CPUDual-core 1.5 GHz Krait (LTE version)/ Cortex-A9 (Non-LTE)1.2 GHz QC 8655
ChipsetSnapdragon S4 (LTE version)/ TI OMAP 4470 (Non-LTE)-
GPUAdreno 225 (LTE version)/ PowerVR SGX544 (Non-LTE)-
OSBlackBerry OS 10, upgradable to 10.3.1BlackBerry OS 7.0
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDHC (dedicated slot)
Internal16GB 2GB RAM8GB 768MB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash
Single8 MP, f/2.2, 31mm (standard), AF5 MP
Video1080p@30fps720p
Selfie camera
Single2 MP-
Video720p-
 -No
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth4.0, A2DP2.1, A2DP, EDR
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPSGPS, A-GPS, BlackBerry Maps
RadioFM radio (after SW upgrade)No
USBmicroUSB 2.0microUSB 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual band, hotspotWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n
Features
Browser-HTML
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassProximity, compass
 HDMI port-
Battery
Music play-Up to 50 h
Stand-byUp to 360 h (3G)Up to 307 h (2G) / Up to 307 h (3G)
Talk timeUp to 10 h (2G) / Up to 13 h 30 min (3G)Up to 6 h 30 min (2G) / Up to 5 h 50 min (3G)
TypeLi-Ion 2100 mAh, removableRemovable Li-Ion 1230 mAh battery
Misc
ColorsBlack, WhiteBlack, White
PriceAbout 110 EURAbout 140 EUR
SAR1.16 W/kg (head)     0.75 W/kg (body)1.19 W/kg (head)     1.03 W/kg (body)
SAR EU1.41 W/kg (head)     0.78 W/kg (body)0.76 W/kg (head)     0.90 W/kg (body)
Tests
Audio quality Noise -89.6dB / Crosstalk -82.7dB Noise -86.3dB / Crosstalk -81.2dB
Battery life Endurance rating 56h -
Camera Photo / Video Photo / Video
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) / 2.856:1 (sunlight) Contrast ratio: 1304:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker Voice 69dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 75dB Voice 71dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 76dB
OUR TESTS
Audio qualityNoise -89.6dB / Crosstalk -82.7dBNoise -86.3dB / Crosstalk -81.2dB
Battery (old)Endurance rating 56h-
CameraPhoto / VideoPhoto / Video
DisplayContrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) / 2.856:1 (sunlight)Contrast ratio: 1304:1 (nominal)
LoudspeakerVoice 69dB / Noise 66dB / Ring 75dBVoice 71dB / Noise 72dB / Ring 76dB

BlackBerry Q10

  • Excellent battery life
  • Potentially better performance (Snapdragon S4)
  • Physical keyboard with touchscreen
  • LTE option available
  • Slightly more modern chipset

  • Camera quality is dated
  • Design is less premium than Bold 9900
  • Software updates ceased long ago

BlackBerry Bold Touch 9900

  • Premium, compact design
  • Classic BlackBerry feel
  • Good build quality
  • Sleek aesthetics

  • Poor battery life
  • Slower performance
  • Camera quality is dated
  • Software updates ceased long ago

Display Comparison

Both devices feature displays of similar size (around 3.2-3.5 inches). The Bold 9900's 1304:1 contrast ratio is respectable, but the Q10's 'infinite' nominal contrast (likely a marketing term) and 2.856:1 sunlight contrast suggest potentially better outdoor visibility. Color accuracy on both is likely limited by the era's display technology.

Camera Comparison

Camera quality on both devices is a weakness by modern standards. Both offer Photo/Video capabilities, but resolution and image quality are limited. The Q10 might have a slight edge due to potentially better image processing, but neither will satisfy today's photography enthusiasts.

Performance

The Q10, particularly the LTE version with the Snapdragon S4, generally offers better performance. Its dual-core 1.5 GHz Krait processor is faster than the Bold 9900's 1.2 GHz QC 8655. The Q10's chipset also benefits from slightly more modern architecture. Expect smoother multitasking and app loading on the Q10.

Battery Life

This is where the Q10 truly shines. With an endurance rating of 56 hours, it significantly outlasts the Bold 9900. The Bold 9900's battery life is considerably shorter, likely struggling to last a full day with moderate use.

Buying Guide

The BlackBerry Q10 is ideal for users who prioritize battery life and appreciate a physical keyboard with a touchscreen. The Bold 9900 is best suited for those who value a premium, compact design and a more traditional BlackBerry experience, accepting shorter battery life.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Is it worth buying a BlackBerry Q10 or Bold 9900 in 2024?
Only if you're a BlackBerry enthusiast seeking a nostalgic experience. Don't expect modern smartphone features or security updates. They are primarily collector's items or for users with very specific needs.
❓ Which BlackBerry has better software support?
Neither. Both devices have long ceased receiving software updates, posing security risks. Using them on modern networks may also present compatibility issues.