Asus Zenfone 7 vs Sony Xperia 5 III: A Deep Dive into Compact Power

The Asus Zenfone 7 and Sony Xperia 5 III represent a dwindling breed: truly compact flagship smartphones. While larger phones dominate the market, these two offer premium experiences in a pocketable form factor. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on performance, battery life, and camera capabilities to determine which one delivers the best overall package.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing longevity and consistent performance, the Sony Xperia 5 III emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 888, coupled with a significantly superior endurance rating of 100 hours, outweighs the Zenfone 7’s slightly lower price point. However, the Zenfone 7 remains a compelling option for those seeking a more affordable flagship.

PHONES
Phone Names Asus Zenfone 7 Sony Xperia 5 III
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 38, 39, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 - USA
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - USA
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat19 1800/150 Mbps, 5G 3.6 Gbps DLHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 -1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - Asia
Launch
Announced2020, August 26. Released 2020, September 012021, April 14
StatusDiscontinuedAvailable. Released 2021, October 08
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 6), aluminum frame
Dimensions165.1 x 77.3 x 9.6 mm (6.5 x 3.04 x 0.38 in)157 x 68 x 8.2 mm (6.18 x 2.68 x 0.32 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight230 g (8.11 oz)168 g (5.93 oz)
 -IP65/IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 6Corning Gorilla Glass 6
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~449 ppi density)
Size6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.1 inches, 86.9 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeSuper AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 700 nits (HBM)OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR BT.2020
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G (7 nm+)Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm)
GPUAdreno 650Adreno 660
OSAndroid 10, upgradable to Android 12, ZenUIAndroid 11, upgradable to Android 13
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 UFS 3.1UFS 3.X
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDR, auto panorama (motorized rotation)Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, eye tracking
Single5 MP, f/2.6, AF8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4", 1.12µm
Triple64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 113˚, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF12 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.7", 1.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.3, 70mm (telephoto), f/2.8, 105mm (telephoto), 1/2.9", dual pixel PDAF, 3x/4.4x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 124˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/2.6", dual pixel PDAF
Video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS, HDR4K@24/25/30/60/120fps HDR, 1080p@30/60/120fps; 5-axis gyro-EIS, OIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDR, auto panorama (motorized rotation)HDR
SingleVGA8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
TripleMotorized flip-up main camera module-
Video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS, HDR1080p@30fps, 5-axis gyro-EIS
Sound
3.5mm jack NoYes
35mm jackNoYes
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
 24-bit/192kHz audio24-bit/192kHz audio Dynamic vibration system
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5)GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-CUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG, video output
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, barometer, compass
 -Native Sony Alpha camera support
Battery
Charging30W wired, PD3.0, 60% in 34 min, 100% in 93 min Reverse wiredWired, PD, 50% in 30 min
Stand-byUp to 450 h (2G) / Up to 430 h (3G)-
Talk timeUp to 14 h 10 min (2G) / Up to 7 h 10 min (3G)-
TypeLi-Po 5000 mAhLi-Po 4500 mAh
Misc
ColorsAurora Black, Pastel WhiteBlack, Green, Pink
ModelsZS670KS, ASUS_I002D, I002DXQBQ62/G, XQBQ52G.UKCX, XQBQ52B.UKCX, XQ-BQ52, XQ-BQ72, XQ-BQ42, XQ-BQ62, SO-53B
PriceAbout 910 EUR€ 431.90 / £ 199.99
SAR1.03 W/kg (head)     1.28 W/kg (body)     -
SAR EU0.52 W/kg (head)     -
Tests
Audio quality Noise -82.1dB / Crosstalk -80.7dB-
Battery lifeEndurance rating 42h Endurance rating 100h
Camera Photo / Video Photo / Video
Display Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) / 2.422:1 (sunlight) Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal)
Loudspeaker Voice 66dB / Noise 63dB / Ring 76dB -26.7 LUFS (Good)
Performance- AnTuTu: 708394 (v9) GeekBench: 3549 (v5.1) GFXBench: 53fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Asus Zenfone 7

  • More affordable price point
  • Unique flip camera design
  • Competent Snapdragon 865 performance

  • Significantly shorter battery life
  • Older Snapdragon 865 chipset
  • Less bright display

Sony Xperia 5 III

  • Exceptional battery life (100h endurance)
  • Faster Snapdragon 888 processor
  • Brighter display for outdoor use

  • Higher price tag
  • May experience some thermal throttling under heavy load
  • Less unique camera design

Display Comparison

The Sony Xperia 5 III boasts a brighter display, peaking at 590 nits, compared to the Zenfone 7’s unspecified peak brightness. While both displays share an 'Infinite' nominal contrast ratio, the Xperia 5 III’s higher brightness translates to better readability under direct sunlight. The Zenfone 7’s display specifications lack details regarding refresh rate or panel technology, while the Xperia 5 III is known for its 120Hz refresh rate, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations. The absence of LTPO in either device suggests neither dynamically adjusts refresh rate for power saving.

Camera Comparison

Both phones are described as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is missing. However, the Xperia 5 III benefits from Sony’s expertise in camera technology and image processing. The Xperia 5 III’s camera system is known for its real-time tracking and advanced video features, likely surpassing the Zenfone 7’s capabilities. The Zenfone 7’s flip camera is a unique feature, offering both front and rear camera functionality without a notch or hole-punch, but this doesn’t necessarily equate to superior image quality. Without specific sensor size or aperture data, it’s difficult to definitively declare a camera winner, but Sony’s track record suggests an advantage.

Performance

The Xperia 5 III’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) represents a generational leap over the Zenfone 7’s Snapdragon 865 (7nm+). The 888 features the Cortex-X1 prime core, offering a performance advantage over the 865’s Cortex-A77. While both CPUs share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the 5nm process node of the 888 provides improved thermal efficiency, potentially mitigating throttling during sustained workloads. The Xperia 5 III’s LPDDR5 RAM, though not explicitly stated in the provided data, is a likely upgrade over the Zenfone 7’s RAM, further enhancing performance. The Zenfone 7’s older chipset may show its age in demanding tasks and future software updates.

Battery Life

The Xperia 5 III’s endurance rating of 100 hours is a significant advantage over the Zenfone 7’s 42 hours. This suggests the Xperia 5 III offers substantially longer battery life in real-world usage. While the Zenfone 7 supports 30W charging, reaching 60% in 34 minutes and 100% in 93 minutes, the Xperia 5 III’s charging speed of 50% in 30 minutes is competitive. The Xperia 5 III’s superior endurance rating effectively mitigates any charging speed difference, making it the more convenient option for users who prioritize minimizing charging frequency.

Buying Guide

Buy the Asus Zenfone 7 if you need a highly capable flagship at a more accessible price point and appreciate the versatility of its flip camera. Buy the Sony Xperia 5 III if you prioritize exceptional battery life, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a more refined multimedia experience, even if it comes at a premium.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 888 in the Xperia 5 III suffer from overheating issues during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 888 is a powerful chip, it is known to generate more heat than its predecessors. However, Sony implemented thermal management solutions in the Xperia 5 III, including a vapor chamber cooling system, to mitigate throttling. While some heat buildup is expected during extended gaming, the Xperia 5 III generally maintains stable performance better than many other 888-powered devices.
❓ Is the flip camera on the Zenfone 7 durable, and does it impact the phone's overall reliability?
Asus claims the flip camera mechanism on the Zenfone 7 is tested for durability, but any moving part introduces a potential point of failure. While reports of widespread issues are limited, the flip camera does represent a unique risk compared to traditional fixed-lens designs. Users should handle the mechanism with care to ensure long-term reliability.
❓ How does the charging speed of the Zenfone 7 compare to real-world usage scenarios?
The Zenfone 7’s 30W charging, while not the fastest available, is still reasonably quick. Reaching 60% in 34 minutes is sufficient for a quick top-up, but the full 100% charge taking 93 minutes suggests it’s not ideal for users who need extremely rapid charging. The lower battery capacity also means you won't be waiting as long to fully charge.