Asus Zenfone 7 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra: A Detailed Comparison of Flagship Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera versatility and charging speed, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 888 offers a performance edge, and the 67W wired and wireless charging significantly outperform the Zenfone 7 Pro’s 30W wired charging. However, the Zenfone 7 Pro remains a compelling option for those seeking a more pocketable flagship.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Asus Zenfone 7 Pro | Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 29, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat19 1800/150 Mbps, 5G 3.6 Gbps DL | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 26. Released 2020, September 01 | 2021, March 29 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, April 02 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), ceramic back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 165.1 x 77.3 x 9.6 mm (6.5 x 3.04 x 0.38 in) | 164.3 x 74.6 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 230 g (8.11 oz) | 234 g (8.25 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~515 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 112.0 cm2 (~91.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED , 90Hz, HDR10+, 700 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 900 nits (HBM), 1700 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.10 GHz Cortex-A77 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A77 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G+ (7 nm+) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 10, upgradable to Android 12, ZenUI | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, auto panorama (motorized rotation) | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, 1.1” AMOLED selfie display |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 113˚, 17mm (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF | 50 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/1.12", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/4.1, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 12mm, 128˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960/1920fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ rec. |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, auto panorama (motorized rotation) | HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | Motorized flip-up main camera module | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS, HDR | 1080p@30/60fps, 720p@120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by Harman Kardon | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct, DLNA |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 30W wired, PD3.0, 60% in 34 min, 100% in 93 min Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 36 min 67W wireless, 100% in 39 min 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aurora Black, Pastel White | Ceramic White (Cosmic White), Ceramic Black (Cosmic Black) |
| Models | ZS671KS, ASUS_I002DD | M2102K1G, M2102K1C |
| Price | About 670 EUR | About 1500 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.08 W/kg (head) 0.81 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.55 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 99h | Endurance rating 95h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -26.6 LUFS (Good) | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 602934 (v8) GeekBench: 3302 (v5.1) GFXBench: 46fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 688720 (v8) GeekBench: 3191 (v5.1) GFXBench: 33fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Asus Zenfone 7 Pro
- More compact and pocketable design
- Excellent battery endurance (99h)
- Unique flip camera mechanism
- Slower charging speed (30W)
- Older Snapdragon 865+ chipset
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
- Faster Snapdragon 888 chipset
- Significantly faster charging (67W wired & wireless)
- Potentially superior camera system
- Larger and heavier design
- Slightly lower battery endurance (95h)
Display Comparison
Both the Zenfone 7 Pro and Mi 11 Ultra feature displays with an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of OLED panels. However, the Mi 11 Ultra boasts a higher peak brightness of 943 nits compared to the Zenfone 7 Pro’s 741 nits, resulting in better visibility under direct sunlight. While both offer excellent viewing experiences, the Mi 11 Ultra’s brighter panel provides a noticeable advantage in outdoor scenarios. Refresh rate is not specified for either, but both are likely 120Hz given the flagship status and chipset capabilities.
Camera Comparison
While both phones are marketed as having excellent cameras, the Mi 11 Ultra distinguishes itself with a more advanced system. Although specific sensor details are not provided, the Mi 11 Ultra’s larger camera module suggests a larger main sensor, enabling better low-light performance and dynamic range. The Mi 11 Ultra also benefits from advanced image processing algorithms, resulting in more detailed and vibrant photos. The Zenfone 7 Pro’s flip camera is a unique feature, but the Mi 11 Ultra’s overall camera capabilities are more comprehensive.
Performance
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) represents a generational leap over the Zenfone 7 Pro’s Snapdragon 865+ (7nm+). The 888’s Cortex-X1 prime core delivers a significant performance boost in single-threaded tasks, while its more efficient 5nm process contributes to improved thermal management. Although the Zenfone 7 Pro’s 865+ is still a capable chip, the 888 in the Mi 11 Ultra offers a smoother experience, particularly in demanding games and applications. Both devices utilize an octa-core CPU configuration, but the architectural improvements in the 888’s cores provide a clear advantage.
Battery Life
The Zenfone 7 Pro achieves an impressive endurance rating of 99 hours, slightly exceeding the Mi 11 Ultra’s 95 hours. However, this advantage is offset by the Mi 11 Ultra’s significantly faster charging capabilities. The Mi 11 Ultra supports 67W wired charging, achieving a full charge in just 36 minutes, and an astonishing 67W wireless charging, completing a full charge in 39 minutes. In contrast, the Zenfone 7 Pro’s 30W wired charging takes 93 minutes to reach 100%. This difference in charging speed is a major advantage for the Mi 11 Ultra, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Asus Zenfone 7 Pro if you need a powerful, yet relatively compact flagship phone with a unique camera mechanism and excellent battery endurance. Buy the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra if you prefer a larger display, a more versatile camera system with superior zoom capabilities, and the fastest possible charging speeds, both wired and wireless.