Asus Snapdragon Insiders vs. Motorola Moto X: A Clash of Eras
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Asus Snapdragon Insiders phone utterly dominates in performance and charging speed thanks to its Snapdragon 888 chipset. While the Moto X boasts impressive endurance for its age, it's simply outmatched. The Asus is the clear winner for users prioritizing speed and modern features.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders | Motorola Moto X |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all versions |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 - AT&T |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 46, 48, 66, 71 | 2, 4, 5, 17 - AT&T |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 18, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 46, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave | - |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (6CA) Cat20 2000/150 Mbps, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat3 100/50 Mbps, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| - | 2, 4, 17 - T-Mobile | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 08 | 2013, August. Released 2013, August |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, August 31 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 173.2 x 77.3 x 9.6 mm (6.82 x 3.04 x 0.38 in) | 129.3 x 65.3 x 10.4 mm (5.09 x 2.57 x 0.41 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 130 g (4.59 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~312 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 4.7 inches, 60.9 cm2 (~72.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Super AMOLED, 144Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (HBM), 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) | Dual-core 1.7 GHz Krait 300 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8960DT Snapdragon S4 Pro |
| GPU | Adreno 660 | Adreno 320 |
| OS | Android 11 | Android 4.2.2 (Jelly Bean), upgradable to 5.1 (Lollipop) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 16GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 2GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 10 MP, f/2.4, 30mm (standard), 1/2.6", 1.4µm, AF |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.4, 80mm (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 112˚, 14mm (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF | - |
| Video | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR | 1080p@30fps, stereo sound rec., HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 24 MP, f/2.5, 27mm (wide), 0.9µm | 2 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Snapdragon Sound Technology 32-bit/384kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 4.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, DLNA, hotspot |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, temperature |
| Illuminated Snapdragon fireball icon on the back | - | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 50 min | - |
| Stand-by | - | Up to 576 h |
| Talk time | - | Up to 13 h |
| Type | Li-Po 4000 mAh | Li-Ion 2200 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Midnight blue | Black, White (front panel), 18 color options (back panel) |
| Models | I007D | XT1058, XT1053, XT1052, XT1056, XT1060, XT1055, XT1049 |
| Price | About 1270 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.39 W/kg (head) 0.50 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | - | Noise -91.6dB / Crosstalk -92.8dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 39h |
Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders
- Blazing-fast performance
- Rapid 65W charging
- Modern display technology
- Advanced camera system
- 5G Connectivity
- Potentially higher price
- May have a shorter battery life than the Moto X (despite fast charging)
- Software support may eventually end
Motorola Moto X
- Excellent battery endurance (for its age)
- Simple and reliable
- Potentially very affordable (used)
- Outdated chipset
- Slow performance
- Low-resolution display
- Poor camera quality
- No 5G
Display Comparison
The Asus likely features a modern AMOLED display with a high refresh rate (likely 90Hz or 120Hz), offering vibrant colors and smooth scrolling. The Moto X probably had an LCD display, which is less vibrant and has a lower refresh rate. The Asus wins hands down in display quality.
Camera Comparison
Modern smartphones have made huge strides in camera technology. The Asus likely has a multi-lens camera system with advanced features like optical image stabilization and computational photography. The Moto X's camera, while decent for its time, is significantly outdated and will produce lower-quality images, especially in low light. The Asus is the clear winner.
Performance
The Snapdragon 888 in the Asus is a beast compared to the Moto X's Snapdragon S4 Pro. The Asus will handle demanding games and multitasking with ease, while the Moto X will struggle. The Asus's octa-core CPU and 5nm process are vastly superior.
Battery Life
The Moto X's endurance rating of 39 hours is impressive for its age, but the Asus's 65W charging means it can reach 50% in just 30 minutes and 100% in 50 minutes. While the Moto X might last longer on a single charge, the Asus offers significantly faster replenishment. It's a trade-off between longevity and charging speed.
Buying Guide
The Asus Smartphone for Snapdragon Insiders is for tech enthusiasts, gamers, and anyone needing top-tier performance. The Motorola Moto X, while outdated, might appeal to those seeking a simple, reliable phone on a very tight budget, understanding its limitations.