Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro vs. ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra: A Deep Dive into Gaming and Charging Champions

The Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro and ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra represent distinct approaches to the high-end smartphone market. The ROG Phone 9 Pro doubles down on gaming with Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the nubia Z60 Ultra focuses on a streamlined flagship experience with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and incredibly fast charging. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For dedicated mobile gamers prioritizing sustained performance and battery life, the Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite and 16:41 active use score provide a superior gaming experience. However, the ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra appeals to users who value rapid charging and a more conventional flagship form factor.

PHONES
Phone Names Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra Leading
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - GlobalHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - International1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE (Up to 7CA), 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, November 192024, July 23
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, November 20Available. Released 2024, August 12
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frameGlass front, aluminum frame, glass back
Dimensions163.8 x 76.8 x 8.9 mm (6.45 x 3.02 x 0.35 in)164 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.35 in)
SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight227 g (8.01 oz)246 g (8.68 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass Victus 2-
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density)1116 x 2480 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density)
Size6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio)6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeLTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 185Hz, 670Hz PWM, HDR10, 1600 nits (HBM), 2500 nits (peak)AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10, 1500 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M)Octa-core (1x3.4 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetQualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm)Qualcomm SM8650-AC Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUAdreno 830Adreno 750 (1 GHz)
OSAndroid 15, up to 2 major Android upgradesAndroid 14, MyOS 14 (International), MyOS 14.5 (China)
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLaser AF, color spectrum sensor, Ring-LED, dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR
Triple50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, gimbal OIS 32 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), 1/3.2", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide)50 MP, f/1.6, 35mm (standard), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/3.3, 85mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3.3x optical zoom (vs. 26mm cam) 50 MP, f/1.8, 18mm, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
Video8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10‑bit video
Selfie camera
FeaturesPanorama, HDRHDR
Single32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide), 1/3.2", 0.7µm12 MP, under display
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker Yes, with stereo speakersYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASSGPS (L1+L2+L5), GLONASS (G1+G5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5)
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C (side), DisplayPort 1.4; USB Type-C (bottom), OTGUSB Type-C 3.1, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging65W wired, PD3.0, PPS, QC5, 100% in 46 min 15W wireless (Qi) 10W reverse wired80W wired, PD3.0, QC4
Type5800 mAhLi-Po 6000 mAh
Misc
ColorsPhantom BlackBlack, Silver
ModelsAI2501-16G512G-BK, AI2501-24G1T-BK-
Price€ 1,139.00 / $ 1,290.00 / £ 1,224.17About 730 EUR

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro

  • Superior gaming performance with Snapdragon 8 Elite
  • Exceptional battery life (16:41h active use)
  • Faster wireless and reverse wired charging

  • Gamer-centric design may not appeal to everyone
  • Potentially bulkier form factor

ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra Leading

  • Faster wired charging (80W)
  • Sleek and modern flagship design
  • Potentially more versatile camera system

  • Shorter battery life (14:04h active use)
  • Lacks wireless and reverse wired charging

Display Comparison

The Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro boasts a display capable of reaching 1958 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the nubia Z60 Ultra’s display specs aren’t provided, ZTE typically employs high-quality panels. The ROG Phone’s focus on gaming suggests a potentially higher refresh rate and lower response time, crucial for competitive play. The ROG Phone’s display technology is likely optimized for color accuracy and low latency, enhancing the visual experience for gamers.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specifications for the nubia Z60 Ultra, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones likely feature flagship-level camera systems. The ROG Phone 9 Pro, while gaming-focused, typically includes capable cameras. The nubia Z60 Ultra, given ZTE’s history, likely prioritizes image quality and features. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and lens apertures makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the nubia Z60 Ultra may offer a more versatile camera experience for general photography.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm), featuring a unique octa-core configuration with Oryon V2 Phoenix cores clocked up to 4.32 GHz. This architecture is designed for sustained peak performance, crucial for demanding games. The ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra, powered by the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm), employs a more conventional octa-core setup with Cortex-X4 and Cortex-A720 cores peaking at 3.4 GHz. While the Gen 3 is powerful, the 3nm process and Oryon architecture of the Snapdragon 8 Elite in the ROG Phone 9 Pro likely provide superior thermal efficiency and sustained performance under heavy load. The ROG Phone’s focus on gaming also suggests optimized thermal management solutions.

Battery Life

The Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro achieves an impressive 16:41 hours of active use, demonstrating exceptional battery life. This is likely due to the efficient Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and optimized power management. The ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra offers 14:04 hours of active use, a respectable figure but noticeably less than the ROG Phone. However, the nubia Z60 Ultra compensates with significantly faster charging – 80W wired versus 65W on the ROG Phone. The ROG Phone 9 Pro also supports 15W wireless and 10W reverse wired charging, features absent in the nubia Z60 Ultra’s provided specs. The nubia Z60 Ultra’s 80W charging can replenish the battery faster, minimizing downtime.

Buying Guide

Buy the Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro if you need uncompromising gaming performance, exceptional battery endurance for extended play sessions, and are willing to accept a more gamer-centric design. Buy the ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra Leading if you prefer a sleek, modern flagship with incredibly fast 80W charging, and prioritize a balance between performance and everyday usability over raw gaming power.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Snapdragon 8 Elite in the ROG Phone 9 Pro throttle under sustained gaming loads?
The Snapdragon 8 Elite’s 3nm process and optimized thermal design in the ROG Phone 9 Pro are specifically engineered to minimize throttling. While some heat generation is inevitable, the ROG Phone 9 Pro is expected to maintain higher clock speeds for longer periods compared to devices with less advanced cooling solutions.
❓ How does the 80W charging on the nubia Z60 Ultra compare to the 65W charging on the ROG Phone 9 Pro in real-world use?
The nubia Z60 Ultra’s 80W charging will noticeably reduce charging times, potentially shaving off 15-20 minutes for a full charge compared to the ROG Phone 9 Pro’s 65W charging. This is particularly beneficial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Is the lack of wireless charging on the ZTE nubia Z60 Ultra a significant drawback?
For users heavily reliant on wireless charging, the absence of this feature on the nubia Z60 Ultra is a notable omission. However, the significantly faster 80W wired charging may compensate for this lack, offering a quicker overall charging experience.
❓ What type of games will truly benefit from the Snapdragon 8 Elite's architecture in the ROG Phone 9 Pro?
Demanding, graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact, Honkai: Star Rail, and Call of Duty: Mobile will showcase the Snapdragon 8 Elite's strengths. The Oryon cores and optimized thermal management allow for higher frame rates and more consistent performance during extended gaming sessions.