Asus ROG Phone 6D vs Xiaomi Poco F5: The Ultimate Gaming Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco F5 offers exceptional value with its bright display, fast charging, and impressive battery life. However, the ROG Phone 6D boasts a more powerful chipset and dedicated gaming features. For serious gamers, the ROG Phone 6D is the better choice, while budget-conscious users will appreciate the Poco F5.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Asus ROG Phone 6D | Xiaomi Poco F5 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48 - A version | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A version | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat19 1600/210 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - B version | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 19 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 11 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 173 x 77 x 10.4 mm (6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 239 g (8.43 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| IPX4 water resistant Illuminated RGB logo (on the back) Pressure sensitive zones (Gaming triggers) | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2448 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1200 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 NTFS support for external storage | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Panorama, HDR | - |
| Single | 12 MP, 28mm (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (2 amplifiers) | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1), NavIC (L5) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 3.1 (side), USB Type-C 2.0 (bottom), OTG, accessory connector | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 65W wired, PD3.0 10W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Space Gray | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | AI2203, AI2203_D | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 690 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
Asus ROG Phone 6D
- Superior Performance (Dimensity 9000+)
- Advanced Cooling System
- Gaming-Specific Features (AirTriggers)
- Fast Charging (65W)
- Higher Price
- Battery Life Not as Impressive as Poco F5
- Design Can Be Divisive
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Excellent Value for Money
- Bright and Vibrant Display (963 nits)
- Long Battery Life (118h Endurance)
- Fast Charging (67W)
- Lower Raw Performance than ROG Phone 6D
- Fewer Gaming-Specific Features
- Build Quality May Not Be as Premium
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes the lead here with a measured peak brightness of 963 nits, offering a significantly brighter and more vibrant viewing experience, especially outdoors. The ROG Phone 6D's display is still good, but lacks the same level of brightness. Both offer excellent contrast ratios, though the Poco F5's is nominally infinite.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable, with both phones capable of capturing decent photos and videos. The Poco F5 might offer slightly better color accuracy, while the ROG Phone 6D could have a slight edge in low-light conditions due to its potentially larger sensor (though specific sensor details are not readily available).
Performance
The ROG Phone 6D's Dimensity 9000+ holds a clear advantage in raw processing power. While the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 in the Poco F5 is no slouch, the 9000+ provides smoother gameplay, especially in demanding titles. The ROG Phone 6D's cooling system also helps maintain performance during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 shines in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 118 hours and active use lasting over 11 hours. The ROG Phone 6D's battery life is respectable, but doesn't quite match the Poco F5's longevity. Both offer 65-67W fast charging, with the Poco F5 charging to 100% in just 46 minutes.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Asus ROG Phone 6D? Serious mobile gamers who prioritize raw performance, advanced cooling, and gaming-specific features. Who should buy the Xiaomi Poco F5? Users seeking a well-rounded smartphone with a vibrant display, long battery life, and excellent value for money.