Apple iPhone Fold vs. Motorola Razr+ 2025: A Deep Dive into the Next Generation of Foldables
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the power user deeply embedded in the Apple ecosystem, the iPhone Fold’s A19 Pro offers a performance edge. However, the Motorola Razr+ 2025 delivers a more balanced experience with excellent battery life (10:12h active use) and faster charging, making it the better choice for most consumers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Apple iPhone Fold | Motorola Razr+ 2025 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | Exp. announcement 2026 | 2025, April 24 |
| Status | Rumored | Available. Released 2025, June 03 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Amorphous alloy frame | Plastic front (unfolded), glass front (folded, Gorilla Glass Victus), silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame (6000 series), hinge (titanium) |
| Dimensions | - | Unfolded: 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mmFolded: 88.1 x 74 x 15.3 mm |
| SIM | eSIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | - | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1920 x 2713 pixels (~428 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.76 inches, 183.2 cm2 | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+ | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, 165Hz, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | - | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Apple A19 Pro (3 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | - | Adreno 735 |
| OS | iOS | Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 24mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS 12 MP, f/2.8, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, dual pixel PDAF, 3D sensor‑shift OIS, 5x optical zoom 48 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, PDAF TOF 3D LiDAR scanner (depth) * camera details are illustrative, no rumored information is available | - |
| Video | 4K@24/25/30/60/100/120fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), ProRes, 3D (spatial) video/audio, stereo sound rec. | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, Dolby Vision HDR, 3D (spatial) audio, stereo sound rec. | HDR |
| Single | 4 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 2.0µm, under display Cover camera: 12 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/3.6", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wired | 45W wired 15W wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5500-6000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black; other colors | Pantone: Mocha Mousse, Midnight Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | - | XT2451-1 |
| Price | About 2500 EUR | $ 500.00 |
Apple iPhone Fold
- Unmatched processing power with the A19 Pro chip
- Likely superior display quality and color accuracy
- Seamless integration with the Apple ecosystem
- Potentially higher price point
- Wired charging only
- Battery life may be compromised by high performance
Motorola Razr+ 2025
- Excellent battery life (10:12h active use)
- Fast 45W wired and 15W wireless charging
- More affordable price point
- Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is less powerful than the A19 Pro
- Camera performance may lag behind the iPhone Fold
- Software updates may be slower than Apple's
Display Comparison
Details regarding the iPhone Fold's display are missing, but given Apple's history, we anticipate a high-peak brightness panel with ProMotion (LTPO) technology for adaptive refresh rates. The Razr+ 2025 likely utilizes a similar LTPO panel, but without the same level of color calibration expected from Apple. The key difference will likely be crease visibility and durability, areas where Apple typically excels. The iPhone Fold will likely have a higher nits output, but the Razr+ 2025 will likely have a more durable hinge.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs for the iPhone Fold, it’s safe to assume Apple will prioritize computational photography and video recording quality. The Razr+ 2025’s camera performance will depend heavily on sensor size and image processing. While the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s ISP is capable, Apple’s image pipeline is renowned for its natural-looking results and dynamic range. The iPhone Fold will likely excel in video recording, while the Razr+ 2025 will need to rely on software optimizations to compete in still photography.
Performance
The Apple A19 Pro, built on a 3nm process, is expected to significantly outperform the Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) in both CPU and GPU benchmarks. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s octa-core configuration (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4, 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720, 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) is a capable performer, but the A19 Pro’s architectural advantages and tighter software integration will provide a smoother experience, especially in graphically intensive applications. The 3nm node of the A19 Pro also translates to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The Motorola Razr+ 2025 boasts a compelling 10:12h active use battery score, indicating excellent power efficiency. While the iPhone Fold’s battery capacity is unknown, Apple typically optimizes software to maximize battery life. However, the A19 Pro’s higher performance demands will likely consume more power. The Razr+ 2025’s 45W wired charging, 15W wireless, and 5W reverse wired charging provide significantly more versatility than the iPhone Fold’s wired-only charging, offering quicker top-ups and the ability to charge accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Apple iPhone Fold if you prioritize raw processing power for demanding tasks like video editing or gaming, and seamless integration with other Apple devices. Buy the Motorola Razr+ 2025 if you value all-day battery life, faster charging speeds (45W wired, 15W wireless), and a more pragmatic foldable experience without the premium Apple price tag.