iPhone 17 vs. vivo X200 Pro mini: A Battle of Efficiency and Raw Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a polished ecosystem, the iPhone 17 emerges as the winner. Its 41-hour endurance and optimized A19 chip offer a seamless experience. However, power users and those valuing rapid charging will find the vivo X200 Pro mini’s 90W capabilities highly appealing.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Apple iPhone 17 | vivo X200 Pro mini |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 53, 66 - A3520 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 53, 66, 70, 75, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - A3520 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, September 09 | 2024, October 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, September 19 | Available. Released 2024, October 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Ceramic Shield 2), aluminum frame, glass back | Glass front, aluminum alloy frame |
| Dimensions | 149.6 x 71.5 x 8 mm (5.89 x 2.81 x 0.31 in) | 150.8 x 71.8 x 8.2 mm (5.94 x 2.83 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time; International)· eSIM + eSIM (8 or more, max 2 at a time; USA)· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM (China) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Ceramic Shield 2, Mohs level 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1206 x 2622 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1216 x 2640 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.3 inches, 96.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.31 inches, 98.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO Super Retina XDR OLED, 120Hz, HDR10, Dolby Vision, 1000 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Hexa-core (2x4.26 GHz + 4xX.X GHz) | Octa-core (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Apple A19 (3 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9400 (3 nm) |
| GPU | Apple GPU (5-core graphics) | Immortalis-G925 |
| OS | iOS 26, upgradable to iOS 26.1 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, sensor-shift OIS 48 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, PDAF | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR (photo/panorama) | Laser AF, Zeiss optics, Zeiss T* lens coating, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120/240fps, HDR, Dolby Vision HDR (up to 60fps), stereo sound rec. | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR, Dolby Vision HDR, 3D (spatial) audio, stereo sound rec. | HDR |
| Single | 18 MP multi-aspect, f/1.9, 20mm (ultrawide), PDAF SL 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) | 32 MP, f/2.0, 20mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@24/25/30/60fps, 1080p@25/30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS | 4K, 1080p |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 6.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, DisplayPort | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | Wired, PD3.2, AVS, 50% in 20 min 25W wireless MagSafe/Qi2, 50% in 30 min (15W - China) 4.5W reverse wired | 90W wired 30W wireless Reverse wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 3692 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White, Mist Blue, Sage, Lavender | Black, White, Green, Pink |
| Models | iPhone18,3, A3520, A3258, A3519, A3521 | V2419A |
| Price | £ 799.00 / € 949.00 | About 610 EUR |
| SAR | 1.19 W/kg (head) 1.19 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.49 W/kg (body) | - |
| EU LABEL | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 41:00h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class C | - |
Apple iPhone 17
- Exceptional 41-hour battery endurance
- Optimized Apple A19 chip for sustained performance
- Long-term battery health with 1000 charge cycles
- Slower charging speeds compared to vivo
- Ecosystem lock-in for some users
vivo X200 Pro mini
- Blazing-fast 90W wired charging
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 9400 processor
- Compact flagship form factor
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to iPhone 17
- Software support may be shorter than Apple's
Display Comparison
The iPhone 17 boasts a measured peak brightness of 1012 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the vivo X200 Pro mini’s display specs are not provided, vivo typically employs high-quality AMOLED panels. The iPhone 17’s likely use of LTPO technology allows for variable refresh rates, conserving battery life. The absence of refresh rate data for the vivo model makes a direct comparison difficult, but the iPhone’s brightness advantage is clear. Bezels are expected to be minimal on both devices, reflecting current design trends.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but the focus should be on the main sensors and image processing. The iPhone 17’s image processing is known for its natural color reproduction and computational photography prowess. The vivo X200 Pro mini, leveraging Mediatek’s ISP, will likely emphasize vibrant colors and aggressive noise reduction. Without sensor size information, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance, but larger sensors generally perform better. The absence of details regarding OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes a definitive camera comparison challenging.
Performance
Both the iPhone 17 and vivo X200 Pro mini leverage a 3nm process, but their CPU architectures differ significantly. Apple’s A19 features a hexa-core configuration (2x4.26 GHz + 4xX.X GHz), prioritizing sustained performance and efficiency. The vivo X200 Pro mini’s Dimensity 9400 employs an octa-core setup (1x3.63 GHz Cortex-X925 & 3x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A720), potentially offering higher peak performance in bursty workloads. The Cortex-X925 core in the Dimensity 9400 is expected to deliver substantial gains over previous generations, but Apple’s tight hardware-software integration often translates to smoother real-world performance. RAM specifications are missing for both, but both are expected to utilize LPDDR5x for fast memory access.
Battery Life
The iPhone 17’s standout feature is its exceptional 41-hour battery endurance and 1000 charge cycles, indicating a focus on long-term battery health. While the vivo X200 Pro mini’s battery capacity is unknown, its 90W wired charging significantly surpasses the iPhone 17’s 25W wired (via USB-C PD3.2 and AVS) and 15W wireless (MagSafe/Qi2). The vivo can achieve a substantial charge in a short time, while the iPhone prioritizes longevity and consistent performance. The iPhone 17’s 4.5W reverse wired charging is a niche feature, while the vivo offers reverse wired charging, though the wattage is unspecified.
Buying Guide
Buy the Apple iPhone 17 if you need a phone that reliably lasts through a full day and beyond, integrates seamlessly with other Apple devices, and offers a long-term software support commitment. Buy the vivo X200 Pro mini if you prioritize raw performance, incredibly fast charging, and a more compact form factor, even if it means potentially shorter battery life between charges.